

The students in role ask whether there were signs of violence in
the area of the dressing room, whether anyone has reported seeing
or hearing from him since his disappearance, whether anyone else
connected with him disappeared at the same time, and whether there
were any sightings of UFO's in the Saskatoon area on the night in
question.(Note)
One of the
investigators says that he has firmly
believed since he first read about it that this is simply a
publicity gimmick. Another says that considering Bryan Adams is a
vegetarian, maybe he has run away to become a Buddhist or something
like that. Another says that he seems to recall that Reveen
appeared in Sask. Place the evening before the Bryan Adams concert
was supposed to have taken place. The teacher fields these
questions and comments with somewhat non-committal responses,
repeating that he really does not know any more than he has already
told them.(Note)
He says that,
as experienced investigators, they know
that it is far too early to speculate on causes and explanations
and he asks them where they think their investigation should
begin.(Note)
The investigators say
The teacher in role tells them that a floor plan of Sask. Place
will be easy to get.(Note)
The police records are not obtainable as the
case is considered "Confidential". He says their budget should
permit them to interview just about anyone they believe must be
heard from. He asks what they'll want to ask of the people they
contact and he records their responses.(Note)
They say
they'll want to
ask:
He asks whether they can think of anything else they should
consider before they get underway. The investigators say they
think they have plenty to start with.(Note)
Interviews/Drawing
The students will:
.
The teacher out of role asks the students who among them has actually been to a concert or a sports event at Sask. Place. Four of the students indicate that they have. One says that her father won tickets to a Slam basketball game last spring and she and her family met the team and had a tour of the building. Two have attended hockey games there and the other, a ZZ Top concert. The teacher asks if these four will agree to work together and create a chart-sized floor plan of the building.(Note) He says that they are simply to work from memory and their collective imaginations to create whatever they think the drama requires. He says it is fortunate that one of them has actually toured the place but that architectural accuracy is not required. He asks them if they will attempt to work in role as supervisors of the Sask. Place security and house staff and to discuss among themselves, as they work, possible theories for what might have happened that evening. They say they will try.
He asks the other students to work in pairs, which he assigns. He
asks each pair to decide between them who will continue in role as
investigators and who will agree to assume the role of one of those
people listed on the chart to whom they believed they must speak.
He asks the investigators to question each individual carefully
using the list of questions posted on the chart and to record their
answers in point form.(Note)
He asks the others
to concentrate carefully
on the questions and to do their best to offer any help they can.
He hopes that someone will come up with something that will provide
a fresh lead. The teacher allows the interviews to continue as
long as the students in role seem to be engaged in their task.(Note)
He
then asks the
students who were being interviewed to work as
investigators and those who were investigators to take on the role
of another individual on the list. He repeats his previous
instructions regarding the task. He asks the students to keep
their notes and to bring them to the next class.
(Note)
Student and Teacher in Role/Meeting/Reflection in Role -- Whole
Group
The students will:
The teacher in role again chairs a meeting of the investigators who have assembled to provide him with a progress report. Referring to the list of people to be interviewed, the teacher asks the students to state which of the people they contacted and to provide a brief summary of what they learned. Several spoke to family members, Bryan Adams' banker, members of his band and the limo driver. Three interviewed his chef; two, his agent. One talked to a caretaker at Sask. Place; one, to Tina Turner; one to the Saskatoon Star Phoenix reporter who broke the story; one, to a police investigator who, he says, owed him a favour; and two, to Reveen.
The teacher notes that they have come up with a wealth of information. He also comments that much of it is contradictory! He asks them to consider everything they have heard and to pick out things that seemed to have been agreed upon by everyone who was interviewed.(Note) After a moment, the investigators say that everyone who was interviewed seemed quite certain that Adams was currently quite happy with his life. No one had spoken of any particular enemies, although one had mentioned that a year ago a concert in Los Angeles had been cut short by a bomb threat. Everyone was becoming more concerned about his disappearance as the weeks passed, particularly as it was very unusual for him not to let friends and family know about his whereabouts at all times.
In light of contradictory evidence regarding the state of his
finances, his plans to take a long break from the concert circuit,
and the mood he was in the day he was last seen, the teacher in
role asks the investigators if they would like to ask further
questions of any of those people they had spoken to earlier. The
investigators say they think they should talk to his banker, his
chef, his brother, the limo driver and members of his band. The
teacher asks for volunteers from among those who had taken on these
roles in the previous interviews. He asks them to come forward one
at a time, to repeat briefly what they told the investigator who
originally spoke to them, and to answer any further questions that
the investigators would now like to ask them.(Note)
This done, the
Students and Teacher
The students will:
The teacher in role greets the investigators and tells them he is
very pleased that they could all meet at such short notice. He
says that since they were last together, many of them had probably
been thinking about this whole baffling business and some may well
have uncovered new clues or information. However, he says, this
morning when he arrived at the agency he found a plain brown
envelope lying on the floor just inside the front door. In it was
a computer-written note which he would like to read to them.(Note)
He
takes the envelope
out of his jacket pocket, removes the note and
reads:
Confidential(Note)It may interest you to know that Bryan Adams is safe and has been in the hands of Chief Inspectors at Scotland Yard for the past three days. Only a select number of top-level police investigators in Britain, the USA and Canada have been given this privileged information. This evening at 10:00 pm CBC News World will break the story in a half-hour News Special. Trust you and your staff will tune in! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a reliable source
The teacher in
role asks whether they have any comments. One investigator asks whether they have any reason to believe an unsigned note. The investigator, who earlier claimed to have a friend on the police force, says that perhaps his friend sent it. He says, if this is the case, he understands why the note was not signed. He says his friend would risk losing his job if he openly spread privileged information. Another investigator asks where and what Scotland Yard is. Another wonders whether Bryan Adams had somehow found his way to England or whether he had been found somewhere else. Another says they really don't know that he was found, perhaps he had turned himself in. Finally, one of them says that if they are to believe anything in the note, they should tune in to the 10:00 o'clock news. The teacher says that they should probably all watch the news special together as, if the note does prove to be true, this could well mark the end of their investigation.Prepared Improvisation -- Small Group
The students will:
The teacher steps out of role and tells the students that they now
have the opportunity to pull the evidence and their thinking about
the whole case together. He asks them if they will agree to work
in small groups. He reminds them that as the work has unfolded, he
has been keeping notes beyond those which are posted around the
room on charts.(Note)
He says that he
has placed each of them in groups
of three, four or five, attempting to create groups that contain
those who have expressed some similar impressions of the case.
Each group will be required to work closely together and to come up
with a series of news items of the sort that are seen on news
broadcasts. These news items will, of course, be developed in the
context of the News Special mentioned in the note.(Note)
He asks if they
The students work in their groups for the next two periods,
organizing their ideas, choosing roles for themselves and
developing a series of interviews and film clips which express
their thinking about the case. They want to know whether they can
use costumes and music, whether they should write "scripts" for
their news items, whether they will be performing them for the
others, and whether they can videotape their work.(Note)
The teacher
suggests that
they do their scenes with a minimum of costumes,
using only costumes pieces that they believe are absolutely
necessary. He says using music is a great idea. He advises them
not to spend their time writing actual lines, but that an outline
of the series of news items they develop would be a good idea. In
fact, he says each group should come up with such an outline to
hand in. He says that they will be presenting them for each other
and that the idea of videotaping the work is something they can all
decide after they've had a chance to see it.(Note)
When the series of
Reflection Out of Role -- Whole Group
The students will:
When all of the work has been presented, the students and teacher
discuss the various news items. They are very enthusiastic about
one another's work. When the teacher asks them whether any of the
explanations for Adams' disappearance strikes them as more
plausible than any other, the students say that from what they know
about rock stars any of what they said in their news broadcasts
could be true. One boy comments that some people do not trust what
they hear and see on the news at any time and that their news
stories around this imaginary incident are as probable as some
other things they might see on the news.(Note)
One student asks
Journal Writing
2. What roles did I assume? Which did I enjoy most? Why?
3. What is the most interesting thing about what I did?
4. What did I learn about myself? Others?
5. What problems did I have to solve while I was working? How did I solve them?
6. What did I do that was new for me?
7. What would I like to have done differently?
8. What have I learned from this experience?
9. What advice would I give the teacher if he was considering doing this drama with another class?
10. What would I like to do other dramas about this year?