Core Curriculum


Components and Initiatives

Core Curriculum includes four components: seven Required Areas of Study, six Common Essential Learnings, the Adaptive Dimension, and Locally-determined Options. Initiatives related to Core Curriculum include Aboriginal Content and Perspectives, Multiculturalism, Gender Equity, and Resource-based Learning.

 

Common Essential Learnings

The incorporation of the Common Essential Learnings into the English language arts program assists students with learning the concepts, skills, and attitudes necessary for success both in school and beyond. Teachers can find many opportunities in their English language arts program for developing the C.E.L.s in an authentic manner. The following are some examples of C.E.L.s that apply in English language arts.

Communication

Numeracy

Critical and Creative Thinking

Technological Literacy

Personal and Social Values and Skills

Independent Learning

For more information, refer to:

Life and Work Competencies

Career development competencies begin at the Elementary Level. As students explore the English language arts, they have opportunities to develop a number of important competencies that will allow students to discover and create the life they want to live and begin to consider the work they want to do. The Blueprint for Life/Work Designs has identified a common framework of competencies that students need to develop to be successful and self-reliant in the rapidly changing knowledge-age of the 21st century. This framework includes the gradual development of several competencies including the following:

  1. Personal Management competencies including:

  2. Learning and Work Exploration competencies including:

  3. Learning and Work Building competencies including:

For more information, refer to Blueprint for Life/Work Designs: Competencies and Indicators K-Adult, Ottawa, ON: Human Resources Development Canada (http://lifework.ca), 1998.

 

Adaptive Dimension

The Adaptive Dimension is an essential part of the English language arts program. Similar to the Common Essential Learnings, the Adaptive Dimension permeates all curriculum and instruction. It encourages teachers to adapt their instruction, environment, and curriculum topics and materials to help students achieve curriculum objectives.

The Adaptive Dimension addresses the importance of providing alternatives for students' learning and assessment activities to promote optimum success for each student. Learning environments for students can be made more accessible through adapting settings, methods, or materials. It is important for teachers to consider the following guidelines:

The Adaptive Dimension includes all practices teachers employ to make learning meaningful and appropriate for each student. Because the Adaptive Dimension permeates all teaching practice, sound professional judgement becomes the critical factor in successful learning.

In the context of a language class, teachers need to be particularly sensitive to variations in language. Students grow up in homes and communities that are culturally and linguistically diverse. As a result, the students' use of the English language may differ from the use of language in the classroom.

Teachers of English language arts need to understand and respect this diversity and be particularly sensitive to dialect and register differences. A dialect is a systematic variation of "standard" English and can be marked by actual word or vocabulary differences (e.g., "Where is the toilet/bathroom/washroom/restroom?"), grammatical differences (e.g., "I don't got none" versus "I don't have any."), and phonological differences (e.g., "He goin' home?" "I don't like dat/that.").

Teachers should also be sensitive to students' understanding of the language registers. An adult uses language in different ways for different audiences and purposes. Students do not always have a sense of the range of language registers or levels (formal/informal, classroom/home) that are appropriate in different situations for different audiences and purposes. Students need to be aware of the language they use and the way they use it. An overriding goal of the English language arts program is to help students communicate more effectively with everyone they encounter.

When working with students for whom English is a Second Language (E.S.L.) or a Second Dialect (E.S.D.), teachers should consider the following guidelines for instruction and assessment:

For more information, refer to:

 

Aboriginal Content and Perspectives

Saskatchewan Education recognizes that the Indian and Métis peoples of the province are historically unique peoples, occupying a unique and rightful place in society. Saskatchewan Education recognizes that education programs must meet the needs of Indian and Métis students, and that changes to existing programs are also necessary for the benefit of all students (Indian and Métis Education Policy from Kindergarten to Grade Twelve, Saskatchewan Education, 1995, p. 2).

The inclusion of Aboriginal content and perspectives promotes the development of positive attitudes in all students toward Indian, Inuit, and Métis peoples. Increasing an awareness of one's own culture and the cultures of others develops all students' self-concepts and promotes an appreciation of Canada's cultural mosaic. In addition, the inclusion of Aboriginal content and perspectives in each curricular area fosters meaningful and culturally relevant experiences for Aboriginal students.

Teachers working with Aboriginal students must recognize that these students come from various cultural backgrounds and social settings including northern, rural, and urban areas. The students' language abilities range from fluency in an Aboriginal language, to degrees of bilingualism in an Aboriginal language and English, to fluency in English. Teachers must understand and respect this diversity and use a variety of teaching strategies to assist all students with English language development. Knowledge of cross-cultural education, language acquisition theory, and second language teaching strategies will assist teachers in meeting the needs of Aboriginal students.

Suggested Aboriginal resources are included in the sample units of this curriculum, as well as in bibliographies developed by Saskatchewan Education. Teachers have a responsibility to choose resources carefully to provide a balance of historical and contemporary perspectives accurately and to teach all students to recognize and discuss bias and stereotyping. Guidelines in Diverse Voices: Selecting Equitable Resources for Indian and Métis Education (Saskatchewan Education, 1992) can assist teachers and students in selecting resources, and in understanding forms of bias in resources that inaccurately portray Aboriginal peoples. The document can help teachers plan classroom experiences that will effectively increase awareness of such bias and develop students' language and critical thinking abilities.

It is important that the English language arts program and classroom resources:

 

Multiculturalism

A multicultural perspective should permeate the English language arts program and reflect all peoples' experiences. Some guidelines follow.

 

Gender Equity

Expectations based primarily on gender can limit students' abilities to develop to their fullest potential; therefore, it is the responsibility of schools to create an educational environment free of gender bias. While some stereotypical views have disappeared, others remain and endeavours to provide opportunities for all students must continue.

The following suggestions from Gender Equity: A Framework for Practice (Saskatchewan Education, 1992) may help teachers in the creation of an equitable learning environment.

 

Resource-based Learning

A resource-based curriculum encourages students and teachers to use a variety of resources in their learning and teaching. In the English language arts program, it is important for teachers to:

For more information refer to:

Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities

Portrayal of persons with disabilities in literature and the mass media has been varied and often negative. This has served to give readers inappropriate information and has engendered attitudes ranging from feelings of pity or revulsion to expectations of superhuman powers of intellect or insight. It is critical that the language arts teacher choose resources that portray persons with disabilities realistically and fairly.

Wherever possible, ability rather than disability should be stressed. Resources implying that persons with disabilities must be cared for or pitied should not be used. Language of the materials should convey respect for the individuality of persons with disabilities. For example, "people with disabilities" or "has a disability" should be used rather than "the less fortunate", "afflicted", or "suffers from a disability".

Literature and media frequently portray people with disabilities in a stereotypical way (Heim, 1994). When evaluating material for use in the English language arts classroom, consider the following:

Role of Technology

Using information and communication technology can assist students in the achievement of many of the objectives in the curriculum. In their research and information management, students can use multimedia resources to find, access, retrieve, and process information and ideas from electronic sources. Students at the Elementary Level may use word processing to plan, draft, format, and revise written work. They also may use presentation software and audiovisual technologies to enhance the effectiveness of their oral and written presentations. Students should understand that they have a responsibility to understand the schools' acceptable use policy and to assess the accuracy and value of information from different sources.

The English language arts objectives will help teachers determine what technology they will use and how they will use it. When using computer software programs, for example, teachers will consider how the software will help students develop a repertoire of strategies for comprehending, composing, and responding to a variety of texts and situations. Effective software provides for different levels of instruction and a variety of ways of learning a language concept, skills, or strategy in an interesting way. Effective software encourages students to learn in genuine and relevant contexts. Ineffective software, by contrast, is often very narrow and superficial (e.g., focusing on skills and drills in isolation and offering the learner few choices and little control). Such software often decontextualizes learning.