Previous Page Bibliography Copyright Page Table of Contents Evergreen Main Menu Discussion Area Next Page

Speaking

Teaching-Learning Strategies

Teacher Guided

Student Empowerment

Specific Strategies

Before

  • Finding a subject (something to say) and clarifying purpose

  • Pre-writing, including researching and planning

  • Considering variables of purpose, audience, and form

  • Making a plan

  • Rehearsing

 

 

 

 
 

During

  • Delivering speech, attending to verbal and nonverbal elements of delivery

  • Showing energy and sincerity in keeping with cultural and linguistic background and audience needs

  • Knowing when to quit

After

  • Handling questions

  • Considering feedback

Before

  • Why am I going to speak? What is my purpose?

  • For whom am I giving this speech?

  • What should I say?

  • How should I organize my ideas?

  • How long should my speech be?

  • Should I use audiovisual aids?

  • How will I give my speech?

  • How will I practise aloud?

During

  • How am I going to gain the attention of my audience?

  • How am I going to end?

 

 

 
 

After

  • How successful was I?

  • What and how can I improve?

One-to-One
(Interpersonal)

  • Conversation
  • Dialogue
  • Interview

One-to-a-Few
(Small Groups)

  • Talking Circle
  • Guided Discussion
  • Group Talk
  • Discussion Group
  • Response Circle
  • Seminar
  • Meeting

One-to-Many
(Public Speaking)

  • Question and Answer
  • Panel Discussion
  • Business Meeting
  • Speech or Presentation
  • Announcement
  • Debate
  • Role Play
  • Storytelling
  • Readers Theatre
  • Improvisation
  • Choral Reading
  • Introduction
  • Toast



Oral Language Development

Oral language is a powerful tool for communicating, thinking, and learning. It shapes, modifies, extends, and organizes thought. Oral language is a foundation of all language development and, therefore, the foundation of all learning. It is the base for the other language strands. Through speaking and listening, students connect with others, learn concepts, develop vocabulary, and perceive the structure of the English language--essential components of learning. Students who have a strong oral language base have an academic advantage. School achievement depends on students’ ability to display knowledge in a clear and acceptable form in speaking as well as writing.

Speech is a vehicle to link individuals to society. Exchanges students have with their peers, teachers, and significant others can help them come to know the world in more personal and socially responsible ways. When students talk about their ideas and listen to the ideas of others, they clarify their thinking. They can figure out what they believe and where they stand on issues.

The written word has taken on an authority in our society, sometimes at the expense of the oral. Yet, in reality, the spoken word will dominate the lives of most students. It is a constant, regardless of what they do in their lives. Facility with language is an asset in daily activities and in the world of work. The competent use of oral language is a natural aspect of lifelong learning skills developed in schools.

To ensure that oral language occupies a central position in the classroom, it must be planned for and directed. When given status, support, and value, it can turn a classroom into a vibrant, interactive environment for learners.

Oral communication is the verbal and nonverbal interaction with an audience to communicate thoughts, information, and feelings. Speech is one way human beings make connections with each other. To speak fluently and confidently in a variety of situations is a central human need and an important goal of education.

Oral language should be integral to learning, rather than a discrete subject area or a separate lesson in an English language arts program. Oral language can grow naturally out of other activities. Oral language is best developed through meaningful use in a trusting environment where students’ cultural backgrounds and communication styles are taken into account.

Teachers play an important role in structuring the type of environment that will promote effective oral language development. They can establish a classroom tone which promotes openness, respect, and trust. Students should feel some ownership in the classroom voice. Language use is a natural part of this learning environment where purposeful talk is seen as an important means to language learning.

Teachers act as role models for language use. However, at the same time, they should recognize that students bring different dialects and ways of communicating into the classroom. It is important to accept students’ language and to extend that language so that students develop flexibility and competence.

Teachers are language diagnosticians. By listening to their students talk, teachers can come to know the students, their interests, and their language needs. They learn what students know, how they learn, and the language and experiences they bring to the classroom. Based on this information, teachers can provide for more stimulating and meaningful language activities.


Speaking Activities

An important goal in a language arts program is to create purposeful and varied activities that will develop individuals who can comfortably and competently participate in a range of situations requiring speech. Hook and Evans (1982) identified four overall kinds of speaking situations that students should encounter, not only in the classroom but in their adult lives. The types of speech range from personal, exploratory speech to more formal, ceremonial speech. Students need to develop fluency and confidence in their oral language through experiences in many types of speech situations.

Because the experiences in Groups I and II are the basis for more formal speech activities, students should have many experiences with these before experiencing those listed in Groups III and IV.

Group I -- Activities for often-used types of speech: inner speech, conversation, talking circles, question and answer, discussion (both small group and whole class), storytelling, oral interpretation.

Group II -- Activities for less-used types of speech: introduction, interview, panel discussion, seminar, business meeting, formal speech, illustrated talk, announcement.

Group III -- Activities for more limited types of speech: debating and dramatization (role playing, improvisation, choral reading/speaking, readers theatre, play reading).

Group IV -- Activities for primarily professional types of speech: special and vocational speeches (e.g., toasts, election speeches, valedictorian speeches, introductory speeches, acceptance speeches).

All speech activities are best incorporated into classroom lessons so that they are integrated and not perceived as separate units.


Group I: Activities for Often-used Types of Speech

Students use informal talk to make their thinking explicit to themselves as well as to others. They also use it to assimilate new concepts and knowledge before attempting more technical and formal language use. Teachers also promote talk to build classroom relationships. By talking in pairs, in small groups, and in whole class discussion, students learn to co-operate and collaborate.

Inner speech underlies all other speech activities. It is important for learning because it serves as a mediator between thought and external speech. Walter (1989) suggests that one way teachers can assist learning is by encouraging the "quality and quantity of interior dialogue--the private talking with oneself that clarifies thought and allows rational discourse with others" (p. 33). When students are aware of their speech processes, they are able consciously to clarify and extend their learning. Whatever the language activity, teachers need to encourage students to be aware of the potential of inner speech in their learning. Simple statements, such as, "Put it in your own words", "Talk it out", "Tell me what you are thinking", encourage the development of inner speech and form the base for other speech activities.

Conversation

Conversation (dialogue) is the social interchange of thoughts, information, or feelings between people. In life and in the classroom, conversation is used to establish self-esteem, build relationships, assess feelings, and seek information. While conversation can be difficult to structure, there are times that focused conversation should be encouraged in the classroom. Students can productively converse about such topics as assignments, literature, film and television, and current issues. Good conversation sets the tone for more structured discussion.

Tchudi and Mitchell (1989) give the following suggestions for using partnerships and dialogues:

Collaborative writing: Students work together as co-authors on a piece of writing. They share ideas, coach each other, and serve as peer editors and proofreaders, producing a stronger piece of writing than either student might produce alone.

Mini-debates: Students take opposite sides of an issue and discuss it, either for themselves or for an audience.

Interviews: Students can interview each other about an area of expertise or, as a team, interview an outside expert. Students should realize that interviews simply are structured conversations.

Response to literature: Students read and work out their interpretation of a literary selection.

Think-Pair-Share: This is a useful method for getting full participation from a class without putting any individual on the spot. This strategy allows for individual reflection prior to responding.

Talking Circles

Talking circles are useful when students need to share feelings or when the topic under consideration has no right or wrong answer. Students are seated in a circle. One student holds an item such as a small stone while speaking. Only the student holding the object is allowed to speak. When finished, the student passes the item clockwise to the next person. This procedure is followed until all participants have had an opportunity to speak. Any participant who does not wish to speak may pass and silence is an acceptable response. Comments that put down others or oneself should be discouraged (e.g., "I don’t think anyone will agree with me, but ..." or "I’m not very good at ...").

Moral or ethical issues can often be dealt with in a talking circle without offending anyone. The purpose of talking circles is not always to reach a decision or consensus. More importantly, the purpose is to create a safe environment for students to share their feelings and points of view. They come to believe what they say will be listened to and accepted without criticism. They gain an empathetic appreciation for points of view other than their own. Students also develop an appreciation for a traditional communication and decision-making style of some Indian and Métis peoples.

Discussions

Discussions consist of a group of students exchanging information, opinions, or experiences and working toward a common goal or adding to common knowledge. Discussions are an effective means of helping students learn to express themselves in small groups or whole class settings. They are usually more structured than conversations.

Whole class discussion: The key to teacher-led discussion is the quality and kind of questions asked. In addition, teachers must listen carefully to students' responses. To ensure that whole-class discussions do not become teacher monologues punctuated by teacher questions, consider the following:

Small group discussion: In small groups, each student has many more opportunities to talk and be listened to than in whole class discussions. Because students must take responsibility for their group's learning, group work develops independence. It fosters and enhances skills in collaboration and allows a teacher to interact more closely and more frequently with individual students. Co-operating effectively in small groups is a life skill.

To ensure that group discussions are as effective as possible, teachers should consider the following:

Some guidelines for students working in groups are listed below.

Working in Groups

Effective group participants exhibit certain traits:

  • They listen politely to the viewpoints of others.

  • They concentrate on the task at hand without digressing or interrupting other groups or the teachers.

  • They discuss issues rather than attacking individuals who raise the issues.

  • They share materials with others in the group.

  • They accept their roles--chairperson, recorder, monitor, and reporter.

  • They are active and positive contributors to the discussion.

  • They are active listeners.

Numerous methods are available to encourage effective small group discussions. Among them are the following:

Grouptalk helps students discuss a given question. Whipple (1975) suggests the following guidelines be given to the students before they begin their discussions. A tape recorder can be used to monitor the discussions.

Starting Rules:

  1. Read today’s question and tell yourself what it means.

  2. Discuss its meaning; tell others what you think the question means.

  3. Decide on one meaning; agree on the meaning before you start answering the question.

Discussion Rules:

  1. Contribute; give your thoughts on the question.

  2. Be relevant; stick to the subject.

  3. Listen; try to understand what someone else is saying.

  4. Respond; comment on what others have said.

Ending Rules:

  1. Sum up; help in the summary by trying to remember the main ideas discussed.

  2. Evaluate; listen to the playback and comment on how well the Grouptalk rules were followed (Moffett and Wagner, 1983, pp. 87-88).

Guided discussion sheets can be prepared to guide a group. For example, a literature-based guide such as the following could be used:

Thirty Below
Elizabeth Brewster

The prairie wind sounds colder
than any wind I have ever heard.
Looking through frosted windows
I see snow whirl in the street
and think how deep
all over the country now
snow drifts
and cars are stuck
on icy roads.
A solitary man walking
wraps his face in a woollen mask,
turns his back sometimes
so as not to front
this biting, eye-smarting wind.
Suddenly I see my dead father
in an old coat too thin for him
the tabs of his cap pulled over his ears,
on a drifted road in New Brunswick
walking with bowed head
towards home.

(Brewster, 1972. Used by permission of Oberon Press.)

Task:

  1. Have one member of the group reread the poem aloud.

  2. In the assigned groups, discuss responses to the following questions.

  3. Reach group consensus on each response.

  4. Record the responses and be prepared to have one group member report them.

Questions:

  1. What images came to mind as you read/heard the poem?

  2. Trace the poet’s thoughts.

  3. What is the theme of the poem?

  4. What common human feelings are explored in the poem?

  5. Is this an effective poem? Why or why not?

Each group member can initial the group’s response sheet and share it with the teacher.

An issue-based discussion guide such as the following could also be used in conjunction with a theme or as an introduction to a novel such as Robb White’s Deathwatch.

You are stranded in the desert dressed in summer clothing. In your desperation you have driven fifty miles off the road, and now your car is out of gas. There is nothing around you but cactus and sand, and it is 40 degrees in the shade. You must try to reach the highway. You can carry only a limited number of things with you.

Look at the list below. Your task is to rank the fifteen items in order of their importance and utility in ensuring your survival. Place 1 by the most important item, 2 by the second most important, and so on through 15, the least important survival item. Consider what you know about the desert in making your decisions. Work individually; then as a group.

__any part of the car
__sunglasses
__jar of Tang
__four chocolate bars
__map of the area
__box of matches
__silk scarf
__ten metres of nylon rope
__first-aid kit
__AM-FM radio
__lipstick
__blanket
__slingshot
__pair of boots
__Coleman lantern

(Belgard, 1984, p. 55. Used with permission of the National Council of Teachers of English.)

Jigsaw activities help students accept responsibility for their learning. Students are divided into groups of no more than five ("home" groups). They research and become experts on a particular piece of the topic, theme, or issue. They then form new "expert" groups. (Each expert group includes one student from each home group.) Expert groups discuss their particular section or assignment to develop a shared understanding. Expert members return to home groups to share their expertise. For example, students could use a jigsaw format to investigate contemporary poetry.

  1. Four poets are chosen to be investigated by the class.

  2. Students form groups of four. This is the home group.

  3. As a group, the students decide which poet each group member will investigate.

  4. Students form expert groups where each of the members is investigating the same poet.

  5. Using the anthologies found in the resource centre, students collectively decide on four to eight representative poems by their poet.

  6. Students in each group prepare some background notes on the poet’s life, the poet’s style, and the poems they have chosen. They decide the best order of presentation of the poems and background information.

  7. Students return to their home group and present a mini-seminar sharing their expertise.

Brainstorming involves groups of students in solving a problem or generating ideas. The following format can be used:

Brainstorming can be used in numerous situations, including to preview a theme (e.g., courage) or to review a theme or group of literary selections (e.g., choosing ten key selections for a class anthology).

Storytelling

Storytelling is an act of sharing, often as important to the storyteller as to the listener. When people tell someone a good story, they release their real language power. Storytelling can come from personal experience, from one's imagination, or from stories heard or read. It involves students by creating a link with peers, with the oral tradition, and with literature. It attunes students to their audience, to the power of language, and to narrative structure. Tanner (1991) provides guidelines for effective storytelling:

Some teaching suggestions for storytelling are:

Reading Aloud/Oral Interpretation

This refers to reading a work of literature in a way that expresses understanding of the piece. It is reading to express meaning and not simply reading words. Oral interpretation should be a frequent part of the language arts program. It provides a great source of pleasure for the reader and listener alike and can dramatically influence students’ attitudes about the value of reading literature. In addition, reading aloud encourages effective listening skills. By reading aloud, teachers can mo del effective interpretation; however, students should also be given opportunities to read. The following ideas can guide the reading. Students can:

Some teaching suggestions include the following:




Assessment of Group I Speaking Activities

Speech is fundamental to a person’s individual and cultural identity. It is the most personal of the language strands and, consequently, the one about which teachers need to be particularly sensitive, especially as far as feedback and assessment are concerned. When giving feedback on students’ speaking abilities, students and teachers should remember four guiding principles:

Assessment refers to collecting information on student progress and learning. Most assessment of Group I speaking activities will be anecdotal in nature. Both oral and written critiques are of value. Oral critiques have a particular value because th e entire class can benefit when standards are shared. Written critiques provide a permanent record of reactions and recommendations. The assessment forms on the following pages may be used in a variety of ways and adapted to individual purposes:




Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Conversation Checklist

Student's Name: _____________________________________________

Characteristic

Observation I

Observation II

Observation III

Listens attentively
 

Speaks audibly
 

Encourages others
 

Does not dominate
 

Interjects politely
 

Questions and clarifies
 

Supports opinions
 

Disagrees tactfully 

 







Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Peer Assessment for Discussion Activities

After your group has met, use the following checklist to determine how well the group is working and what could be done to make it work better. If you can think of additional points, please add them.

Names: ___________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
Date: ________________________________ Class: _______________________________

As a group, we:

Yes

No

Not sure

1. knew what we were trying to accomplish




2. stayed on task




3. talked openly and on topic




4. listened to one another




5. allowed and encouraged everyone to participate




6. tried to reach consensus




7. asked for clarifications as needed




8. paraphrased one another’s points




9.




10.




As a group, we worked well by:

 

 

One aspect we can improve is to:

 

 

(Graham & George, 1992, p. 59. Used by permission of Pembroke Publishers Ltd.)


Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Self-assessment for Discussion Activities

Group Name: ___________________________ Subject: _______________________________________

Date: __________________________________

Rate yourself on each category using the rating scale below. Each member of your group should do the same.

Names of participants (Rate each category for each person 0,1,2,3)









































Stayed on task
0 - spent most of the time talking off the topic
1 - spent some of the time talking off the topic
2 - spent much of the time completing the assignment
3 - spent almost all of the time completing the assignment or
encouraging others to do so

Made valuable contributions to project
0 - made few useful contributions
1 - made some useful contributions
2 - made several useful contributions
3 - contributed greatly to the group’s success

Co-operative
0 - showed no awareness of group rules
1 - showed little awareness of group rules
2 - only broke rules a few times
3 - did not break group rules

Undisplayed Graphic

Undisplayed Graphic

Undisplayed Graphic

Undisplayed Graphic

Additional Comments: (Individual accomplishments, etc.)

 

 

Participants’ Signatures:

 

 

(Communications 11 and 12, 1985, pp. 86-87. Used by permission of British Columbia Ministry of Education.)


Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Discussion Activities

Group: ____________________________________       Date: __________________


seldom or not at all

sometimes

often or always

Participation
Group members:




  • speak in a courteous manner



  • listen actively to each other’s ideas and encourage everyone to participate



  • respond positively or negatively to ideas rather than to personalities



  • eliminate problems courteously



Comments:

 




Leadership
Group members:




  • monitor the group’s progress and attempt to keep the group on task



  • are willing to take on responsibilities for group tasks



  • alternate tasks occasionally



Comments:

 




Thought
Group members:




  • attempt to understand each other’s ideas



  • attempt to clarify and expand each other’s ideas



Comments:

 




(Oster, Iveson, & McClay, 1989, p. 244. Reproduced with the permission of Prentice Hall Canada Inc.)


Printing and copying this template Require Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Group Discussion

Class: __________________________ Date: _____________________
Students' Names      
Participation Rating: Rating: Rating:

4 Perceptive, Insightful

3 Thoughtful, Methodical

2 On Topic, Mechanical

1 Sporadic, Weak


Comments: Comments: Comments:
Listening Rating: Rating: Rating:

4 Interested, Involved

3 Focused

2 Attentive

1 Weak, Inconsistent


Comments: Comments: Comments:
Respect for Others in the Group Rating: Rating: Rating:

4 Considerate, Courteous

3 Aware, Tactful

2 Limited Regard

1 Indifferent, Unaware


Comments: Comments: Comments:



Printing and copying this template Require Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Rubric for Group Discussion

  Participation Active Listening Respect for Others in the Group

4
Perceptive, Insightful

Intent/Purpose - insightful comments advance and stimulate discussion; fresh perspectives given; some evidence of differing perspectives being discussed; occasionally, suggestions of proposals analyzed

Assignment Focus - a clear understanding of assignment evident; effective approach used to complete assignment thoroughly

Social Structure - work harmoniously together; members interject politely; members disagree tactfully

Language - precise, clear language enhances mutual understanding of discussion issues

Interested, Involved

Ideas - when necessary, members paraphrase what others have said to confirm or clarify understanding and allow for corrective feedback; probing questions asked of others

Social Structure - verbal and nonverbal communication of others appropriately acknowledged and built upon

Nonverbal - effective gestures or body language used effectively and deliberately to respond to, and sometimes shape, communication with others

Considerate, Courteous

Ideas of Others - ideas and opinions of others acknowledged and understanding is sought and valued

Expression of Ideas - opinions and positions of all members confidently expressed without affecting group morale or cohesiveness

Differences - diverse opinions expected and sought out; differences clarified and areas of common understanding pursued


3
Thoughtful, Methodical

Intent/Purpose - comments easy to follow and advance discussion; information beyond personal opinion shared, such as examples from other students, parents, teachers, magazines, books, or TV shows

Assignment Focus - clear understanding of assignment demonstrated; appropriate approach used to complete assignment substantially

Social Structure - comfortable working together, take turns, listen while others speak, offer recognition to others; most members interject politely and disagree tactfully

Language - appropriate, accurate language promotes understanding

Focused

Ideas - respond verbally to ideas of others; may ask for clarification or summarize comments to ensure comprehension

Social Structure - verbal and nonverbal communication of others occasionally acknowledged

Nonverbal - effective gestures and body language used for effect (e.g., smiling or nodding encouragingly, gestures for emphasis)

Aware, Tactful

Ideas of Others - interest and curiosity in ideas of others demonstrated

Expression of Ideas - opinions communicated without passing judgement (e.g., using "I" versus "you" messages); discussions facilitated and extended, persevering beyond initial impressions

Differences - differences that arise are resolved or accepted tactfully/peacefully


2
On Topic, Mechanical

Intent/Purpose - comments make sense and are relevant to the discussion; personal opinions shared with some supporting information

Assignment Focus - mechanical understanding of assignment demonstrated; inquiry sustained until sufficient work done in students' opinion

Social Structure - follow basic rules in conversing with others, take turns, usually listen while others speak, sometimes offer recognition to others, usually willing to accept group decisions

Language - familiar language used with few embellishments; complex or unfamiliar ideas lack clarity; members speak clearly using appropriate volume

Attentive

Ideas - ideas of others acknowledged by gesture or phrase; occasionally members repeat the ideas of others to acknowledge or indicate support

Social Structure - verbal and nonverbal communication of others occasionally acknowledged

Nonverbal - effective gestures and body language used for emphasis, to show support or to get attention (e.g., students move into close proximity as group works)

Limited Regard

Ideas of Others - minimal response to ideas of others

Expressions of Ideas - some attention paid to the consequences of speech or actions on others; at times, taking turns or accepting suggestions from others difficult

Differences - differences that arise are sometimes ignored, sometimes acknowledged but usually left without resolution


1
Sporadic, Weak

Intent/Purpose - comments may address the assignment, however this connection or relevance is not obvious; comments may inhibit discussion or promote digression; personal opinions shared

Assignment Focus - limited understanding of or indifference to assignment is evident; may be unable to sustain inquiry to adequately fulfill the assignment, or lack understanding of the amount of work required adequately to address assignment

Social Structure - members may withdraw and/or allow the group to become disorganized or unfocussed; logic and sequence of the discussion may be hard to understand; ideas are repeated; debating or arguing may occur without developing the issue

Language - simplistic language used; elaboration, explanation, clarification of ideas absent; some words not spoken clearly but meaning evident in context

Weak, Inconsistent

Ideas - feedback may be offered only if requested; difficulty in responding to questions may be experienced

Social Structure - passive involvement, or speakers often interruped

Nonverbal - effective use of gestures or body language is minimal or nonexistent suggesting indifference, boredom, or lack of involvement; ineffective or annoying gestures or body language may be displayed at times

Indifferent, Unaware

Ideas of Others - contributions neither acknowledged nor response given

Expression of Ideas - little or no attention paid to the consequences of speech or action on others

Differences - differences often suppressed or ignored; sometimes give rise to arguments




Printing and copying this template Require Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Storytelling Checklist

This form can be used by student, peer, or teacher.

Check the appropriate column

Student’s Name: _____________
Story Title:
Date:

Comments

 

  1. Expresses self spontaneously

  2. Has good memory

  3. Can retell story in own words

  4. Uses facial expressions, gestures, and dramatization to convey meaning and sustain interest

  5. Uses voice as an instrument (loud/soft, fast/slow, high/low)

  6. Involves the audience as participants in the story

  7. Uses pauses, delays, and questions to heighten suspense

  8. Uses puppets, pictures, or other "props" to complement the story

  9. Draws, paints, or constructs to complement the story as it unfolds






(Mowbray & George, 1992, p. 55. Used by permission of Pembroke Publishers Ltd.)


Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Oral Interpretation

Name: ___________________________________ Selection: ______________________
Date: ___________________________________

Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., pronunciation) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students’ speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.

Circle a mark for each section. Excellent is 10. Poor is 1. The other numbers are somewhere between. For instance, 5 or 6 would be average.

Pronunciation:
Correct.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Incorrect.

Enunciation:
Clear.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Hard to understand.

Rate:
Suitable for selection.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Unsuitable for selection.

Volume:
Appropriate, audible.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Inappropriate, inaudible.

Pitch:
Suitable for selection.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Unsuitable for selection.

Fluency:
Read groups of words smoothly.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Read word by word.

Emphasis:
For emphasis, said some words
and phrases more clearly, more
slowly, and in a lower tone.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Did not emphasize any words or
phrases, or emphasized them in an
unsuitable way.

Comments:

 

(Booth, Cameron, & Lashmar, Vol. 3, 1986, p. 64. Reproduced with the permission of Prentice Hall Canada Inc.)


Group II: Activities for Less-used Types of Speech

Group II activities include many speaking activities that are found in daily life as well as in the classroom. They are important because they expand students’ oral language repertoires.

Introductions

Students should have some opportunities to practise introducing guest speakers, as this is a skill frequently used in adult life. The introduction should be brief and interesting. The students’ most important job is to tell who is speaking and why. They should include information that will catch the attention of the audience and that is complimentary to the speaker. Students should make sure all words are pronounced correctly, especially the speaker’s name, which should be mentioned at the beginning and at the end.

Some teaching suggestions for practising introductions include:

Interviews

An interview can often be an effective method of obtaining information. Students will be interviewed whenever they apply for work. Many of them will become the interviewers in the future.

When students are involved in research prior to an interview, they should:

  1. Find sources. Decide who is the best person to talk to regarding the subject and contact that person. If using the telephone, students should:

  2. Plan questions ahead of time. Students should decide what they want to know and plan questions that will require elaboration (rather than "yes" or "no"). As well, they should record and sequence questions.

  3. Conduct the interview, remembering to:

  4. End the interview by thanking the interviewee.

  5. Synthesize the information collected and organize it for presentation.

Some activities for practising interviews are as follows:

Teachers or students can identify possible jobs using want ads or government publications. With a partner, students list questions that they anticipate may be asked in a particular job interview. They write answers to the questions, then take turns role playing the interview. After each interview, they should review their performance. Students can be chosen to role play good interview technique for the whole group.

At the beginning of a course, students prepare questions to ask a peer. They interview the person and, with that information, introduce their partner to the class. A variation would have students presenting an award to their partner (e.g., most likely to succeed in the hockey world, the next Oscar-winning actor, the top engineering graduate). Props, such as home made trophies, can be presented.

Students can role play characters from literature and the media. For example, Oprah interviews Polonius concerning the relationship between Ophelia and Hamlet, or Jay Leno interviews Jem Finch ten years after To Kill a Mockingbird ends.

With a partner, students can prepare and conduct a mock telephone interview with a well-known author, sports figure, or literary character.

Media interviews: This type of interview is an important tool for journalists and can be easily used for the study of interviewing techniques.

Job interviews: Most students will participate in job interviews at some point in their lives. The interview gives the employer an opportunity to form a first-hand impression of applicants and, therefore, it is important to create a good impression. Students need to be prepared for a job interview. They should:

  1. Research the job. Find out as much as possible about the job beforehand. Anticipate questions that may be asked and formulate answers. Consider questions like the following:

  2. Dress appropriately.

  3. Be on time. Go alone. Smile and shake hands firmly with the interviewer(s).

  4. Listen carefully to the questions asked. Answer thoughtfully. Speak clearly. Use appropriate body language. Do not slouch, chew gum, or smoke.

  5. Exhibit confidence in yourself.

  6. Ask questions about the job. Thank the interviewer.

  7. Follow up on the interview. Make some notes, evaluate performance, and write a thank-you card.

Some activities for practising interviews are as follows:

Panel discussions

Panel discussions occur when a group discusses an issue by pooling its knowledge and working toward a solution. Panel discussions encourage the sharing of different views. They encourage participants and audience to adopt an attitude of inquiry. They also allow for audience participation. A panel is usually made up of three to seven people and the format is similar to the following:

  1. Opening remarks by the chairperson.

  2. Introduction of speakers.

  3. Formal presentation by panel members of different points of view or aspects of the issue.

  4. Informal exchange of comments, additions, and rebuttals.

  5. Audience’s questions and comments.

Some teaching suggestions for panel discussions follow:

Symposiums

Symposiums are formal public discussions in which individuals present speeches giving their own views on a pre-selected topic or question. The topic is open to debate and the goal of the symposium is to explore the question and to consider various perspectives and possible answers. In contrast with an informal discussion and panel discussion, the participants prepare and present formal speeches based on their independent research, rather than speaking spontaneously in response to questions from the leader or moderator.

Each participant prepares a formal speech based on his or her research. The moderator introduces the symposium and each speaker, leads the discussions that follow the individual presentations, and summarizes the symposium.

Business meetings

Business meetings are structured discussions which lead to group decisions. Most students will be involved in numerous organizations during their lifetimes and will benefit from knowing the basics of parliamentary procedure, which allows for meetings to run smoothly and efficiently. Students should be aware that formal meetings usually follow this pattern:

  1. Call to order by the chairperson.

  2. Approval of agenda and adoption of the minutes of the previous meeting.

  3. Business arising from the previous meeting.

  4. Reports of various committees.

  5. New business.

  6. Correspondence and announcements.

  7. Adjournment by the chairperson.

Students can benefit from learning the terminology of business meetings and practising such aspects as planning an agenda, chairing a meeting, writing minutes, making and amending motions, voting, and addressing the chair. Students must accept responsibility to contribute and listen to the contributions of others. They must strive to stick to the topic at hand and respect the chairperson’s authority.

Students often have difficulty with the format of making motions. A motion leads to a group decision through the following process:

  1. The person making the motion begins by saying, "I move that ...".

  2. A motion requires a "seconder", a person who agrees that this motion should be discussed: "I second the motion."

  3. A discussion of the motion follows. Anyone wishing to speak is acknowledged by the chairperson before speaking. Generally, a person is allowed to speak to a motion twice.

  4. As the discussion nears an end, the chairperson asks, "Is there any further discussion?" If not, voting follows. Motions are generally voted on by a show of hands. The chairperson votes only if there is a tie.

Robert’s Rules of Order or similar documents provide further information on amending and tabling motions.

Some teaching suggestions for business meetings are:

Formal Speeches

A formal speech is a spoken essay and, like an essay, it can be used to inform or explain, to persuade, or to entertain. Effective speeches are carefully prepared, thoroughly rehearsed, sincere, and energetically delivered. Students should always consider audience, purpose, and situation. They should use appropriate language and verbal and nonverbal presentation elements for their audience, in order to communicate effectively and show respect for their audience.

  1. Preparation

  2. Rehearsal

  3. Delivery

Illustrated talks

An illustrated talk or report involves the co-ordination of spoken and visual materials. Students might use posters, charts, graphs, slides, video, overhead projector, chalkboard, props, or handouts. The following guidelines can help make their talk effective:

Some teaching suggestions include:

Announcements

An announcement is a short statement designed to give information and arouse interest. Announcements are like the leads of news stories in that they answer the five "Ws" (who, what, when, where, and why). As announcements are common in school and out, students can benefit from some experience in this area.

Students should:

If using a microphone, students should know microphone technique:

Some teaching ideas include:




Assessment of Group II Speaking Activities

Assessing formal speaking is a complex process. Teachers should be sensitive to the many factors involved in public speaking. Teachers should not expect perfection but should take students from where they are and help them become more effective public speakers. Teachers may need to adapt assessment instruments to accommodate students from different linguistic or cultural backgrounds. They should consider the purpose of the activity and provide an appropriate amount of feedback for the assignment.

Hook and Evans (1982) suggest a possible method for appraising individuals’ contributions to panel discussions that would work well with discussions of almost any type. They suggest that teachers keep a tally sheet and mark each time a student speaks. A plus (+) indicates a helpful contribution, a zero (0) indicates a neutral one, and a minus (-) indicates a contribution that is "digressing, sidetracking, blocking, or overly aggressive" (p. 435). For example,

Student One: 0+++000000
Student Two: ++++
Student Three: 00--0--
Student Four: 000++

The forms on the following pages can be adapted for assessment of Group II Speaking Activities:




Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Introducing a Speaker

Name: __________________________________ Date: __________________________

Circle a mark for each section. Excellent is 10. Poor is 1. The other numbers are somewhere between. For instance, 5 or 6 would be average.

  • Was not courteous or pleasant
  • Was courteous, pleasant

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

  • Gave little useful information about the speaker
  • Told something interesting and appropriate about the speaker

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

  • Left out or mispronounced name
  • Stated name clearly

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

  • Did not state clearly subject of speech
  • Stated subject clearly and precisely

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

  • Disorganized
  • Well organized

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

  • Made long statements about speaker’s subject
  • Left the subject mostly for the speaker to handle

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Comments:

 

 

(Booth, Cameron, & Lashmar, Vol. 2, 1986, p. 62. Reproduced with the permission of Prentice Hall Canada Inc.)


Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Research Interview

Subject: ______________________________________ Date: ______________________

Interviewer: __________________________________

Interviewee: __________________________________

P = poor A = average G = good E = excellent

The Interviewer …

P

A

G

E

Comments

established a friendly attitude






spoke clearly and audibly






asked clear and direct questions






sequenced questions effectively






listened well






offered encouragement and support






allowed silence or wait time after questions and
responses






Strengths of this interview (identify two):

 

 

Target for improvement (identify one):

 

 

Additional Comments:

 

 




Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Group Presentation

Group Members:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Date:


Topic:


Purpose:


Audience:

Aspects of Presentation Teacher's Observations Rating
Content  

4 Insightful, Provocative

3 Focused, Substantial

2 Adequate, Practical

1 Sketchy, Disorganized

Language  

4 Rich, Memorable

3 Precise, Well Chosen,

2 Clear, Adequate

1 Vague, Minimal

Presentation/ Delivery Style  

4 Exciting, Sophisticated

3 Smooth, Polished

2 Competent, Adequate

1 Unenthusiastic, Inconsistent

Overall Rating  




Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Rubric for Group Presentation

  Content Language Presentation/Delivery Style

4
Insightful, Provocative

Intent/Purpose - clear, articulate statement of purpose and subject; captivates audience and focuses topic

Position - strong, well-defined with relevant, accurate, specific details that explain or support the position

Organization - explanations and descriptions clear, memorable and cohesive; may introduce a new perspective

Conclusion - conclusions clearly stated and substantially supported

Rich, Memorable

Intent/Purpose - point of view clear; development or support conclusive or complete; consistently speaks sensitively of others

Clarity - creates clarity and understanding by using vivid, precise, accurate language

Structure - all statements structurally correct and interrelated

Language Choice - word pictures and phrases reflect the personality of the group; uses innovative, precise, and varied word choices

Exciting, Sophisticated

Poise - relaxed, self-confident, self-composed

Voice - fluctuation in volume and inflection helps maintain audience interest and emphasize key points

Pacing - effective use of pause giving sense of drama; length of presentation matches allotted time

Awareness of Audience - excellent suitability of speech content and delivery to the audience's knowledge, interest, and need

Body Language - natural movement and descriptive gestures display energy, create mood, and help audience visualize


3
Perceptive, Substantial

Intent/Purpose - introduction has strong purpose statement

Position - clear position with appropriate, substantial details that explain/support position

Organization - explanations and descriptions focused and cohesive

Conclusion - conclusions supported by data or evidence

Precise, Well Chosen

Intent/Purpose - point of view clear, with support coming from a variety of sources; usually speaks sensitively of others

Clarity - uses clear, specific language with few errors

Structure - most statements structurally correct and related to the topic

Language Choice - choice and arrangement of words reflect the personality of the group; uses descriptive or humorous language to achieve effects

Smooth, Polished

Poise - quick recovery from moments of occasional tension

Voice - uses variation of tone, volume, and inflection

Pacing - pattern of delivery successful; length matches allotted time

Awareness of Audience - good suitability of speech content and delivery to audience knowledge, interest, and need; may use humour

Body Language - movements and gestures generally enhance delivery


3
Adequate, Practical

Intent/Purpose - introductory statement informs, gives general purpose of presentation

Position - definite but general position, some support offered

Organization - explanations and descriptions utilitarian and generally accurate; supported by examples, facts, and/or statistics

Conclusion - conclusions stated and minimally substantiated

Clear, Adequate

Intent/Purpose - clarity of point of view attempted, using some supporting data

Clarity - for the most part, uses clear, accurate language with some errors

Structure - speech and diction adequate; a few lapses in sentence structure and grammar may be present

Language Choice - avoids awkward phrases and wordiness; may attempt to use descriptive or humorous language

Competent, Adequate

Poise - attempts to maintain self-composure

Voice - includes some variation of tone, volume, and inflection

Pacing - pattern of delivery generally successful; slight mismatch between length and allotted time

Awareness of Audience - message reflects limited awareness of audience; may refer to common interests and experiences

Body Language - uses appropriate but minimal or slightly exaggerated body language


1
Sketchy, Disorganized

Intent/Purpose - purpose of presentation not clearly stated in introduction; or introductory statement missing completely

Position - some information given, may not directly relate to topic; may be presented in disorganized pieces giving vague idea of position

Organization - explanations and descriptions incomplete or confusing; may use opinion as fact

Conclusion - very thin data/evidence in support of ideas/conclusions; partial summary of major ideas; or presentation may stop abruptly without giving summary

Vague, Minimal

Intent/Purpose - point of view may not be clearly communicated to the audience; may speak insensitively of others

Clarity - uses vague or general language; at times, may be inaccurate

Structure - sentence structure may be awkward, unclear, or even unfinished; grammatical and structural errors present

Language Choice - uses familiar generalized language; frequently repeats a favourite word(s) or phrase(s)

Unenthusiastic, Inconsistent

Poise - minimal self-composure; or may demonstrate indifference

Voice - uneven volume with little or no inflection and/or monotonous tone

Pacing - uneven or inappropriate patterns of delivery; length does not match allotted time

Awareness of Audience - message reflects little awareness of audience; occasionally off-target

Body Language - insufficient movement and/or awkward gestures may impede effectiveness of presentation




Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Panel Discussions

Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., rate) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students’ speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.

For each item listed, circle a mark out of 10.

Name of Student: ______________________________

Date: ________________

1. Preparation (research, background reading)

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

2. Ability to persuade

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

3. Contribution to group learning

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

4. Ability to listen (concentration, understanding)

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

5. Clearness of ideas presented

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

6. Use of important details to support statements made

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

7. Effectiveness of delivery (volume, rate, gestures)

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

8. Effective use of language (word choice, grammar, sentence structure)

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

9. Overall organization (introduction, body, conclusion)

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

10. Responses to questions

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

Now total the marks you circled.

______
100

Comments:

Signature of Evaluator ____________________________________

(Booth, Cameron, & Lashmar, 1986, p. 62. Reproduced with the permission of Prentice Hall Canada Inc.)


Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Individual Profile for a Business Meeting

Name: _________________________________________________________

Date: __________________________________________________________


Yes

No

Arrives early or on time



Is prepared



Has adequate knowledge of procedures



Assists chairperson to facilitate



Participates but does not monopolize



Is courteous and attentive



Takes part in discussion and decisions



Comments:

 

 






Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Formal Speaking: Form One

Speaker: _________________________ Date of Presentation: _____________________

Some of the items listed below (e.g., eye contact, pacing, expression) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students’ speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.

For each item, check the box with the most accurate description.

Presentation

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Volume. Was the speaker’s voice loud enough?

Too loud or too soft

Usually loud enough

Easily heard, with voice loud or soft as required

Diction. Were the speaker’s words easy to understand?

Mumbling or monotonous

Usually understandable

Clear, easily understood

Pacing. Was the speaker’s speed appropriate?

Too fast or too slow

Speed usually good

Good speed, going fast or slow to fit material

Eye Contact. Did the speaker use eye contact effectively?

Little or no eye contact

Some eye contact

Appropriate eye contact

Gestures. Did the speaker use appropriate body movements that contributed to your understanding of the meaning?

No gestures used

Occasional gestures used

Gestures used appropriately

Expression. Did the speaker’s voice express feeling?

Little or no expression

Some expression

Consistently expressed appropriate feeling

Understanding of material. Did the speaker indicate an understanding of the material?

Uncertain or confused delivery

Usually in control

Strong, purposeful presentation

Effect on audience. Did the speaker make it easy for you to understand and have an interest in what was said?

No enthusiasm, dull

Showed enthusiasm and sincerity

Created enthusiasm or other appropriate feeling in audience

Content and Organization

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Introduction. Did the speaker let you know immediately what the speech would be about?

Introduction dull, confusing

Made topic clear

Made topic clear and created interest in it quickly

Body of speech. Did the speaker lead you steadily from one idea to the next with examples, where needed?

Disorganized, confused

Ideas seemed to be connected

Well organized, maintained high interest

Summary of conclusion. Did the speaker pull together all the ideas of the speech and end it logically?

Trailed off at the end

Let you know the speech was over

Tied up all loose ends but left you wanting to hear more

(Adapted from Shaparro & Trost, 1985, p. 29. Used by permission of McDougal, Littell and Co.)


Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Download Acrobat Reader

Sample Assessment for Formal Speaking: Form Two

Speaker: _______________________________________ Date: ___________________

Topic: _________________________________________ Audience: ________________

Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., pronunciation, rate, eye contact) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students’ speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.

Students could be given the option to weight their delivery more or less than the content of their presentation (e.g., 60 percent for content and 40 percent for delivery or vice versa). The teacher might also vary the allocations depending on the focus of learning.


Comments

Score

Content (list criteria):


  • /50

    Organization
        Introduction
        Body
        Conclusion


    /10

    Voice
        Volume
        Pitch
        Rate
    Diction
        Pronunciation
        Enunciation


    /10

    Body Language
        Eye Contact
        Gestures
        Posture


    /10

    Persuasion and Interest


    /10

    Other Remarks
    (e.g., used audiovisual aids, stories, anecdotes, quotations, kept to allotted time)


    /10



    /100




    Group III: Activities for More Limited Types of Speech

    Group III speaking experiences are those required during special situations in life. In English language arts courses, they are used primarily to further the understanding and appreciation of issues.

    Debating

    Debating is a discussion of the arguments for and against something and can be either formal or informal. Even two people can have a debate. A useful classroom debate format follows:

    1. Decide on a topic and a proposition. For example, "Be it resolved that Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is relevant to today’s youth".

    2. Choose four students. Two students take the affirmative. They research and attempt to defend Romeo and Juliet’s relevance. The other two students refute the resolution. They attempt to prove that Romeo and Juliet is not relevant.

    3. The four students alternate, each presenting speeches of a pre-determined time (e.g., five minutes). The order is:

    4. Each of the four is allowed a few minutes to disprove the other team's arguments. The order is:

    5. The class may direct questions to the four debaters.

    6. A vote is taken.

    Debates can be structured so they involve an entire class. Cruchley (1984) developed the following format for a full-class debate:

    1. Establish an issue with the class.

    2. Divide the class into pro and con. Rearrange the desks to have the two sides face each other.

    3. Each student independently records ideas and proofs to justify his/her assigned position.

    4. Begin with the affirmative.

    5. Use the following rules:

    The chairperson keeps a running tally of points accumulated.

    Activities to practise debating might include:

    In formal debates, attention must be paid to conventions and time lines.

    Drama

    Drama can play an important role in the language arts classroom. Through imaginative role playing, and voice and movement exercises, students can use drama as a basis for learning. They can express themselves, experiment with new ideas, respond to situations, develop understanding, concentrate, and gain confidence.

    Role playing and improvisation: These are the bases of much drama. Choral reading, readers theatre, and play reading can all grow from them. Role playing is pretending that one is another person. Students attempt to think, act, speak, and react as they think that person would. An improvisation is a dramatic representation that has been composed and presented on the spur of the moment. There is no script and the direction the improvisation takes depends upon the students’ interpretation of character. Role playing and improvisation may arise from literary selections (e.g., Dracula meets Lady Macbeth) or they may arise from issues (e.g., a clerk accuses a teenager of stealing).

    There are many possibilities for role playing and improvisation in the language arts. For example:

    Choral Reading

    Choral reading is oral reading in unison with others. (This activity is called choral speaking when students recite rather than read a selection.) Choral reading works particularly well with poetry. Participation in choral reading helps students imp rove their literary interpretation and oral reading as they practise their articulation, breathing, and vocal flexibility. They learn to co-operate as their voices blend or harmonize with others. As students select a piece of literature and prepare it f or presentation, they need to consider four questions in order to produce the desired interpretation:

    Three possible choral reading/speaking arrangements for poetry are:

    Students can explore different combinations of these patterns.

    Readers Theatre

    Readers theatre is a dramatic form in which students read aloud from scripts. Ideas and emotions are conveyed through vocal expression with a minimal use of props and gestures. The focus is on the vocal rather than the visual. Readers theatre benefits both audience and performers. The audience is stimulated intellectually and emotionally by the performance; the performers are challenged to use their imagination and voice. Stories, diaries, essays, poems, plays, and novel segments lend themselves t o readers theatre. Because it does not rely on scenery or other visual props, readers theatre can be performed anywhere. It can be staged in a number of ways. See the examples on the following page.

    Readers theatre can be very useful to English language arts teachers because it presents literature without all the complexities involved in an actual stage production. In adapting literature to readers theatre, students should consider the following criteria:

    Readers Theatre
    (Tanner, 1991, p. 344. Used with permission of Clark Publishing Co.)

    Chamber Theatre is a variation of readers theatre. A narrator is used and other members of the group act out what the narrator is saying. Some possibilities for readers theatre and chamber theatre include A Christmas Carol, Our Town, A Rope Against the Sun, and The Last Night of the World.

    Plays, of course, are written to be heard. When students read plays aloud their voices should reflect an appropriate interpretation.


    Assessment of Group III Speaking Activities

    The assessment forms on the following pages can be adapted and used by teachers, students, or peers when evaluating Group III speaking activities:

    Sample Assessment Form for Debate
    Sample Parliamentary Debate Assessment
    Sample Assessment for Role Playing
    Sample Assessment for Choral Reading
    Sample Assessment for Readers Theatre.


    Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
    Download Acrobat Reader

    Sample Assessment Form for Debate

    This form can be used for the assessment of an individual or a team by self, peers, or teacher.

    Rating scales: Superior - 1, Excellent - 2, Good - 3, Fair - 4, Poor - 5

    Debater(s):


    Rating

    Comments

    Organization of own case

     



    Analysis of the debate issues

     



    Use of evidence (examples, authority,
    statistics, analogy)

     



    Refutation and rebuttal

     



    Asking questions

     



    Answering questions

     



    (Adapted from Hanks, 1975, p. 81. Used with permission of J. Weston Walch Publisher.)


    Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
    Download Acrobat Reader

    Sample Parliamentary Debate Assessment

    Debaters: ____________________________________________________

    Date: _____________________________

    (Government Leader) Low High
    1. Government Leader - 5 min.

    2. First Speaker (negative) - 5 min.

    3. Second Speaker (affirmative) - 5 min.

    4. Second Speaker (negative) - 5 min.

    5. Third Speaker (affirmative) - 5 min.

    6. Third Speaker (negative) - 7 min.

    7. Government Leader Rebuttal - 2 min.

    Analysis
    Evidence
    Organization
    Delivery

    Total _____

    1 2 3 4 5
    First Speaker (Negative)
    Analysis
    Evidence
    Organization
    Delivery

    Total _____

    1 2 3 4 5
    Second Speaker (Affirmative)
    Analysis
    Evidence
    Organization
    Delivery

    Total _____

    1 2 3 4 5
    Second Speaker (Negative)
    Analysis
    Evidence
    Organization
    Delivery

    Total _____

    1 2 3 4 5
    Third Speaker (Affirmative)
    Analysis
    Evidence
    Organization
    Delivery

    Total _____

    1 2 3 4 5
    Third Speaker (Negative)
    Analysis
    Evidence
    Organization
    Delivery

    Total _____

    1 2 3 4 5

    (Mowbray & George, 1992, pp. 67-68. Used with permission of Pembroke Publishers Ltd.)


    Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
    Download Acrobat Reader

    Sample Assessment for Role Playing

    Student’s Name: _________________________________________

    Date: _________________________________


    1. Communicated character

    Low High
    1 2 3 4 5

    2. Became immediately involved in scene

    1 2 3 4 5

    3. Sustained characterization

    1 2 3 4 5

    4. Spoke clearly

    1 2 3 4 5

    5. Used appropriate dialogue

    1 2 3 4 5

    6. Gestured and moved in character

    1 2 3 4 5

    7. Maintained concentration

    1 2 3 4 5

    Overall effect

    1 2 3 4 5




    Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
    Download Acrobat Reader

    Sample Assessment for Choral Reading

    Student’s Name: _______________________________ Date: _____________________

    Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., pronunciation, eye contact) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students&# 146; speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.

    Rate student’s work in rehearsal and performance of choral reading according to the following rating and criteria.

    P = Poor A = Average G = Good E = Excellent

    Attitude

    P

    A

    G

    E

    Co-operated with director





    Co-operated with the group





    Worked seriously on part





    Accepted constructive criticism





    Was constantly alert to the material





    Contributed to a unified whole





    Memorization (if used)





    Memorized part correctly





    Memorized part by deadline





    Voice





    Enunciated words clearly





    Pronounced words correctly





    Projected well





    Adjusted voice to selection





    Body





    Adjusted facial expression to material





    Adjusted body response to material





    Used appropriate eye contact





    Scripts (if used)





    Handled scripts unobtrusively





    (Tanner, 1991, p. 337. Used with permission of Clark Publishing Co.)


    Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
    Download Acrobat Reader

    Sample Assessment for Readers Theatre

    Student’s Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________

    Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., pronunciation, rate, eye focus) can vary across cultures and in accordance with situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students&# 146; speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.

    Rate student’s work in rehearsal and performance of a readers theatre program according to the following rating and criteria: P = poor A = average G = good E = excellent

    Attitude

    P

    A

    G

    E

    Co-operated with director





    Co-operated with the group





    Worked seriously on part





    Accepted suggestions





    Was constantly alert to the material





    Contributed to a unified whole





    Voice





    Adjusted voice to suggest the role





    Used adequate volume





    Used appropriate rate





    Enunciated words clearly





    Pronounced words correctly





    Body





    Adjusted facial expression to the role





    Adjusted physical response to the role





    Maintained appropriate eye focus





    Handled script unobtrusively





    Characterization





    Developed role into distinct, convincing person





    Maintained character





    Reflected character’s motivation through movement





    Projected effective degree of emotion





    Maintained spontaneity





    Comments:

    (Adapted from Tanner, 1991, p. 34. Used with permission of Clark Publishing Co.)


    Group IV: Activities for Primarily Professional Types of Speech

    Speech activities related to specialized situations (e.g., toasts, election speeches, acceptance speeches, etc.) can help prepare students for entering certain professions. However,

    Teaching the types of speaking needed for professional work is primarily the responsibility of the college or vocational school, not of the high school. The foundation for the specialized speech required of a salesperson or minister are laid in the elementary and high schools, but detailed work is possible only later, when one enters his or her vocation (Hook & Evans, 1982, p. 436).

    If there is a natural opportunity for practising Group IV speech activities, teachers should seize that opportunity. For instance, as students approach graduation, teachers may help them with their addresses and toasts.

    Oral communication should be at the heart of the curriculum. It is neither difficult nor expensive for teachers to improve the communication climate of their classrooms to help students learn more effectively.

    Previous Page Bibliography Copyright Page Table of Contents Evergreen Main Menu Discussion Area Next Page