|
Teaching-Learning Strategies | ||
|
Teacher Guided |
Student Empowerment |
Specific Strategies |
|
Before
During
After
|
Before
During
After
|
One-to-One
One-to-a-Few
One-to-Many
|
Oral Language Development
Oral language is a powerful tool for communicating, thinking, and learning. It shapes, modifies, extends, and organizes thought. Oral language is a foundation of all language development and, therefore, the foundation of all learning. It is the base for the other language strands. Through speaking and listening, students connect with others, learn concepts, develop vocabulary, and perceive the structure of the English language--essential components of learning. Students who have a strong oral language base have an academic advantage. School achievement depends on students ability to display knowledge in a clear and acceptable form in speaking as well as writing.
Speech is a vehicle to link individuals to society. Exchanges students have with their peers, teachers, and significant others can help them come to know the world in more personal and socially responsible ways. When students talk about their ideas and listen to the ideas of others, they clarify their thinking. They can figure out what they believe and where they stand on issues.
The written word has taken on an authority in our society, sometimes at the expense of the oral. Yet, in reality, the spoken word will dominate the lives of most students. It is a constant, regardless of what they do in their lives. Facility with language is an asset in daily activities and in the world of work. The competent use of oral language is a natural aspect of lifelong learning skills developed in schools.
To ensure that oral language occupies a central position in the classroom, it must be planned for and directed. When given status, support, and value, it can turn a classroom into a vibrant, interactive environment for learners.
Oral communication is the verbal and nonverbal interaction with an audience to communicate thoughts, information, and feelings. Speech is one way human beings make connections with each other. To speak fluently and confidently in a variety of situations is a central human need and an important goal of education.
Oral language should be integral to learning, rather than a discrete subject area or a separate lesson in an English language arts program. Oral language can grow naturally out of other activities. Oral language is best developed through meaningful use in a trusting environment where students cultural backgrounds and communication styles are taken into account.
Teachers play an important role in structuring the type of environment that will promote effective oral language development. They can establish a classroom tone which promotes openness, respect, and trust. Students should feel some ownership in the classroom voice. Language use is a natural part of this learning environment where purposeful talk is seen as an important means to language learning.
Teachers act as role models for language use. However, at the same time, they should recognize that students bring different dialects and ways of communicating into the classroom. It is important to accept students language and to extend that language so that students develop flexibility and competence.
Teachers are language diagnosticians. By listening to their students talk, teachers can come to know the students, their interests, and their language needs. They learn what students know, how they learn, and the language and experiences they bring to the classroom. Based on this information, teachers can provide for more stimulating and meaningful language activities.
Speaking Activities
An important goal in a language arts program is to create purposeful and varied activities that will develop individuals who can comfortably and competently participate in a range of situations requiring speech. Hook and Evans (1982) identified four overall kinds of speaking situations that students should encounter, not only in the classroom but in their adult lives. The types of speech range from personal, exploratory speech to more formal, ceremonial speech. Students need to develop fluency and confidence in their oral language through experiences in many types of speech situations.
Because the experiences in Groups I and II are the basis for more formal speech activities, students should have many experiences with these before experiencing those listed in Groups III and IV.
Group I -- Activities for often-used types of speech: inner speech, conversation, talking circles, question and answer, discussion (both small group and whole class), storytelling, oral interpretation.
Group II -- Activities for less-used types of speech: introduction, interview, panel discussion, seminar, business meeting, formal speech, illustrated talk, announcement.
Group III -- Activities for more limited types of speech: debating and dramatization (role playing, improvisation, choral reading/speaking, readers theatre, play reading).
Group IV -- Activities for primarily professional types of speech: special and vocational speeches (e.g., toasts, election speeches, valedictorian speeches, introductory speeches, acceptance speeches).
All speech activities are best incorporated into classroom lessons so that they are integrated and not perceived as separate units.
Students use informal talk to make their thinking explicit to themselves as well as to others. They also use it to assimilate new concepts and knowledge before attempting more technical and formal language use. Teachers also promote talk to build classroom relationships. By talking in pairs, in small groups, and in whole class discussion, students learn to co-operate and collaborate.
Inner speech underlies all other speech activities. It is important for learning because it serves as a mediator between thought and external speech. Walter (1989) suggests that one way teachers can assist learning is by encouraging the "quality and quantity of interior dialogue--the private talking with oneself that clarifies thought and allows rational discourse with others" (p. 33). When students are aware of their speech processes, they are able consciously to clarify and extend their learning. Whatever the language activity, teachers need to encourage students to be aware of the potential of inner speech in their learning. Simple statements, such as, "Put it in your own words", "Talk it out", "Tell me what you are thinking", encourage the development of inner speech and form the base for other speech activities.
Conversation
Conversation (dialogue) is the social interchange of thoughts, information, or feelings between people. In life and in the classroom, conversation is used to establish self-esteem, build relationships, assess feelings, and seek information. While conversation can be difficult to structure, there are times that focused conversation should be encouraged in the classroom. Students can productively converse about such topics as assignments, literature, film and television, and current issues. Good conversation sets the tone for more structured discussion.
Tchudi and Mitchell (1989) give the following suggestions for using partnerships and dialogues:
Collaborative writing: Students work together as co-authors on a piece of writing. They share ideas, coach each other, and serve as peer editors and proofreaders, producing a stronger piece of writing than either student might produce alone.
Mini-debates: Students take opposite sides of an issue and discuss it, either for themselves or for an audience.
Interviews: Students can interview each other about an area of expertise or, as a team, interview an outside expert. Students should realize that interviews simply are structured conversations.
Response to literature: Students read and work out their interpretation of a literary selection.
Think-Pair-Share: This is a useful method for getting full participation from a class without putting any individual on the spot. This strategy allows for individual reflection prior to responding.
Talking Circles
Talking circles are useful when students need to share feelings or when the topic under consideration has no right or wrong answer. Students are seated in a circle. One student holds an item such as a small stone while speaking. Only the student holding the object is allowed to speak. When finished, the student passes the item clockwise to the next person. This procedure is followed until all participants have had an opportunity to speak. Any participant who does not wish to speak may pass and silence is an acceptable response. Comments that put down others or oneself should be discouraged (e.g., "I dont think anyone will agree with me, but ..." or "Im not very good at ...").
Moral or ethical issues can often be dealt with in a talking circle without offending anyone. The purpose of talking circles is not always to reach a decision or consensus. More importantly, the purpose is to create a safe environment for students to share their feelings and points of view. They come to believe what they say will be listened to and accepted without criticism. They gain an empathetic appreciation for points of view other than their own. Students also develop an appreciation for a traditional communication and decision-making style of some Indian and Métis peoples.
Discussions
Discussions consist of a group of students exchanging information, opinions, or experiences and working toward a common goal or adding to common knowledge. Discussions are an effective means of helping students learn to express themselves in small groups or whole class settings. They are usually more structured than conversations.
Whole class discussion: The key to teacher-led discussion is the quality and kind of questions asked. In addition, teachers must listen carefully to students' responses. To ensure that whole-class discussions do not become teacher monologues punctuated by teacher questions, consider the following:
Small group discussion: In small groups, each student has many more opportunities to talk and be listened to than in whole class discussions. Because students must take responsibility for their group's learning, group work develops independence. It fosters and enhances skills in collaboration and allows a teacher to interact more closely and more frequently with individual students. Co-operating effectively in small groups is a life skill.
To ensure that group discussions are as effective as possible, teachers should consider the following:
Some guidelines for students working in groups are listed below.
Working in Groups Effective group participants exhibit certain traits:
|
Numerous methods are available to encourage effective small group discussions. Among them are the following:
Grouptalk helps students discuss a given question. Whipple (1975) suggests the following guidelines be given to the students before they begin their discussions. A tape recorder can be used to monitor the discussions.
Starting Rules:
Discussion Rules:
Ending Rules:
Guided discussion sheets can be prepared to guide a group. For example, a literature-based guide such as the following could be used:
Thirty Below
Elizabeth Brewster
The prairie wind sounds colder
than any wind I have ever heard.
Looking through frosted windows
I see snow whirl in the street
and think how deep
all over the country now
snow drifts
and cars are stuck
on icy roads.
A solitary man walking
wraps his face in a woollen mask,
turns his back sometimes
so as not to front
this biting, eye-smarting wind.
Suddenly I see my dead father
in an old coat too thin for him
the tabs of his cap pulled over his ears,
on a drifted road in New Brunswick
walking with bowed head
towards home.
(Brewster, 1972. Used by permission of Oberon Press.)
Task:
Questions:
Each group member can initial the groups response sheet and share it with the teacher.
An issue-based discussion guide such as the following could also be used in conjunction with a theme or as an introduction to a novel such as Robb Whites Deathwatch.
You are stranded in the desert dressed in summer clothing. In your desperation you have driven fifty miles off the road, and now your car is out of gas. There is nothing around you but cactus and sand, and it is 40 degrees in the shade. You must try to reach the highway. You can carry only a limited number of things with you.
Look at the list below. Your task is to rank the fifteen items in order of their importance and utility in ensuring your survival. Place 1 by the most important item, 2 by the second most important, and so on through 15, the least important survival item. Consider what you know about the desert in making your decisions. Work individually; then as a group.
|
__any part of the car
__sunglasses __jar of Tang __four chocolate bars __map of the area __box of matches __silk scarf __ten metres of nylon rope |
__first-aid kit
__AM-FM radio __lipstick __blanket __slingshot __pair of boots __Coleman lantern |
(Belgard, 1984, p. 55. Used with permission of the National Council of Teachers of English.)
Jigsaw activities help students accept responsibility for their learning. Students are divided into groups of no more than five ("home" groups). They research and become experts on a particular piece of the topic, theme, or issue. They then form new "expert" groups. (Each expert group includes one student from each home group.) Expert groups discuss their particular section or assignment to develop a shared understanding. Expert members return to home groups to share their expertise. For example, students could use a jigsaw format to investigate contemporary poetry.
Brainstorming involves groups of students in solving a problem or generating ideas. The following format can be used:
Brainstorming can be used in numerous situations, including to preview a theme (e.g., courage) or to review a theme or group of literary selections (e.g., choosing ten key selections for a class anthology).
Storytelling
Storytelling is an act of sharing, often as important to the storyteller as to the listener. When people tell someone a good story, they release their real language power. Storytelling can come from personal experience, from one's imagination, or from stories heard or read. It involves students by creating a link with peers, with the oral tradition, and with literature. It attunes students to their audience, to the power of language, and to narrative structure. Tanner (1991) provides guidelines for effective storytelling:
Some teaching suggestions for storytelling are:
Reading Aloud/Oral Interpretation
This refers to reading a work of literature in a way that expresses understanding of the piece. It is reading to express meaning and not simply reading words. Oral interpretation should be a frequent part of the language arts program. It provides a great source of pleasure for the reader and listener alike and can dramatically influence students attitudes about the value of reading literature. In addition, reading aloud encourages effective listening skills. By reading aloud, teachers can mo del effective interpretation; however, students should also be given opportunities to read. The following ideas can guide the reading. Students can:
Some teaching suggestions include the following:
|
/ = pause
// = stop > = softer |
< = louder
__ = stress |
Speech is fundamental to a persons individual and cultural identity. It is the most personal of the language strands and, consequently, the one about which teachers need to be particularly sensitive, especially as far as feedback and assessment are concerned. When giving feedback on students speaking abilities, students and teachers should remember four guiding principles:
Assessment refers to collecting information on student progress and learning. Most assessment of Group I speaking activities will be anecdotal in nature. Both oral and written critiques are of value. Oral critiques have a particular value because th e entire class can benefit when standards are shared. Written critiques provide a permanent record of reactions and recommendations. The assessment forms on the following pages may be used in a variety of ways and adapted to individual purposes:
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Student's Name: _____________________________________________
|
Characteristic |
Observation I |
Observation II |
Observation III |
|
Listens attentively
Speaks audibly
Encourages others
Does not dominate
Interjects politely
Questions and clarifies
Supports opinions
Disagrees tactfully
|
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Peer Assessment for Discussion Activities
After your group has met, use the following checklist to determine how well the group is working and what could be done to make it work better. If you can think of additional points, please add them.
Names: ___________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
Date: ________________________________ Class: _______________________________
|
As a group, we: |
Yes |
No |
Not sure |
|
1. knew what we were trying to accomplish | |||
|
2. stayed on task | |||
|
3. talked openly and on topic | |||
|
4. listened to one another | |||
|
5. allowed and encouraged everyone to participate | |||
|
6. tried to reach consensus | |||
|
7. asked for clarifications as needed | |||
|
8. paraphrased one anothers points | |||
|
9. | |||
|
10. |
As a group, we worked well by:
One aspect we can improve is to:
(Graham & George, 1992, p. 59. Used by permission of Pembroke Publishers Ltd.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Self-assessment for Discussion Activities
Group Name: ___________________________ Subject: _______________________________________
Date: __________________________________
Rate yourself on each category using the rating scale below. Each member of your group should do the same.
Names of participants (Rate each category for each person 0,1,2,3)
|
Stayed on task
Made valuable contributions to project
Co-operative
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Comments: (Individual accomplishments, etc.)
Participants Signatures:
(Communications 11 and 12, 1985, pp. 86-87. Used by permission of British Columbia Ministry of Education.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Discussion Activities
Group: ____________________________________ Date: __________________
|
seldom or not at all |
sometimes |
often or always | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Participation
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Oster, Iveson, & McClay, 1989, p. 244. Reproduced with the permission of Prentice Hall Canada Inc.)
Printing and copying this template Require
Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Group Discussion
| Class: __________________________ Date: _____________________ | |||
| Students' Names | |||
| Participation | Rating: | Rating: | Rating: |
4 Perceptive, Insightful 3 Thoughtful, Methodical 2 On Topic, Mechanical 1 Sporadic, Weak
|
Comments: | Comments: | Comments: |
| Listening | Rating: | Rating: | Rating: |
4 Interested, Involved 3 Focused 2 Attentive 1 Weak, Inconsistent
|
Comments: | Comments: | Comments: |
| Respect for Others in the Group | Rating: | Rating: | Rating: |
4 Considerate, Courteous 3 Aware, Tactful 2 Limited Regard 1 Indifferent, Unaware
|
Comments: | Comments: | Comments: |
Printing and copying this template Require
Acrobat Reader
Sample Rubric for Group Discussion
| Participation | Active Listening | Respect for Others in the Group | |
4 |
Perceptive, Insightful
Intent/Purpose - insightful comments advance and stimulate discussion; fresh perspectives given; some evidence of differing perspectives being discussed; occasionally, suggestions of proposals analyzed Assignment Focus - a clear understanding of assignment evident; effective approach used to complete assignment thoroughly Social Structure - work harmoniously together; members interject politely; members disagree tactfully Language - precise, clear language enhances mutual understanding of discussion issues |
Interested, Involved
Ideas - when necessary, members paraphrase what others have said to confirm or clarify understanding and allow for corrective feedback; probing questions asked of others Social Structure - verbal and nonverbal communication of others appropriately acknowledged and built upon Nonverbal - effective gestures or body language used effectively and deliberately to respond to, and sometimes shape, communication with others |
Considerate, Courteous
Ideas of Others - ideas and opinions of others acknowledged and understanding is sought and valued Expression of Ideas - opinions and positions of all members confidently expressed without affecting group morale or cohesiveness Differences - diverse opinions expected and sought out; differences clarified and areas of common understanding pursued |
3 |
Thoughtful, Methodical
Intent/Purpose - comments easy to follow and advance discussion; information beyond personal opinion shared, such as examples from other students, parents, teachers, magazines, books, or TV shows Assignment Focus - clear understanding of assignment demonstrated; appropriate approach used to complete assignment substantially Social Structure - comfortable working together, take turns, listen while others speak, offer recognition to others; most members interject politely and disagree tactfully Language - appropriate, accurate language promotes understanding |
Focused
Ideas - respond verbally to ideas of others; may ask for clarification or summarize comments to ensure comprehension Social Structure - verbal and nonverbal communication of others occasionally acknowledged Nonverbal - effective gestures and body language used for effect (e.g., smiling or nodding encouragingly, gestures for emphasis) |
Aware, Tactful
Ideas of Others - interest and curiosity in ideas of others demonstrated Expression of Ideas - opinions communicated without passing judgement (e.g., using "I" versus "you" messages); discussions facilitated and extended, persevering beyond initial impressions Differences - differences that arise are resolved or accepted tactfully/peacefully |
2 |
On Topic, Mechanical
Intent/Purpose - comments make sense and are relevant to the discussion; personal opinions shared with some supporting information Assignment Focus - mechanical understanding of assignment demonstrated; inquiry sustained until sufficient work done in students' opinion Social Structure - follow basic rules in conversing with others, take turns, usually listen while others speak, sometimes offer recognition to others, usually willing to accept group decisions Language - familiar language used with few embellishments; complex or unfamiliar ideas lack clarity; members speak clearly using appropriate volume |
Attentive
Ideas - ideas of others acknowledged by gesture or phrase; occasionally members repeat the ideas of others to acknowledge or indicate support Social Structure - verbal and nonverbal communication of others occasionally acknowledged Nonverbal - effective gestures and body language used for emphasis, to show support or to get attention (e.g., students move into close proximity as group works) |
Limited Regard
Ideas of Others - minimal response to ideas of others Expressions of Ideas - some attention paid to the consequences of speech or actions on others; at times, taking turns or accepting suggestions from others difficult Differences - differences that arise are sometimes ignored, sometimes acknowledged but usually left without resolution |
1 |
Sporadic, Weak
Intent/Purpose - comments may address the assignment, however this connection or relevance is not obvious; comments may inhibit discussion or promote digression; personal opinions shared Assignment Focus - limited understanding of or indifference to assignment is evident; may be unable to sustain inquiry to adequately fulfill the assignment, or lack understanding of the amount of work required adequately to address assignment Social Structure - members may withdraw and/or allow the group to become disorganized or unfocussed; logic and sequence of the discussion may be hard to understand; ideas are repeated; debating or arguing may occur without developing the issue Language - simplistic language used; elaboration, explanation, clarification of ideas absent; some words not spoken clearly but meaning evident in context |
Weak, Inconsistent
Ideas - feedback may be offered only if requested; difficulty in responding to questions may be experienced Social Structure - passive involvement, or speakers often interruped Nonverbal - effective use of gestures or body language is minimal or nonexistent suggesting indifference, boredom, or lack of involvement; ineffective or annoying gestures or body language may be displayed at times |
Indifferent, Unaware
Ideas of Others - contributions neither acknowledged nor response given Expression of Ideas - little or no attention paid to the consequences of speech or action on others Differences - differences often suppressed or ignored; sometimes give rise to arguments |
Printing and copying this template Require
Acrobat Reader
This form can be used by student, peer, or teacher.
|
Check the appropriate column |
|
|
|
|
|
Students Name: _____________
Comments
|
|
(Mowbray & George, 1992, p. 55. Used by permission of Pembroke Publishers Ltd.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Oral Interpretation
Name: ___________________________________ Selection: ______________________
Date: ___________________________________
Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., pronunciation) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.
Circle a mark for each section. Excellent is 10. Poor is 1. The other numbers are somewhere between. For instance, 5 or 6 would be average.
|
Pronunciation:
|
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 |
Incorrect. |
|
Enunciation:
|
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 |
Hard to understand. |
|
Rate:
|
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 |
Unsuitable for selection. |
|
Volume:
|
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 |
Inappropriate, inaudible. |
|
Pitch:
|
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 |
Unsuitable for selection. |
|
Fluency:
|
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 |
Read word by word. |
|
Emphasis:
|
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 |
Did not emphasize any words or |
Comments:
(Booth, Cameron, & Lashmar, Vol. 3, 1986, p. 64. Reproduced with the permission of Prentice Hall Canada Inc.)
Group II activities include many speaking activities that are found in daily life as well as in the classroom. They are important because they expand students oral language repertoires.
Introductions
Students should have some opportunities to practise introducing guest speakers, as this is a skill frequently used in adult life. The introduction should be brief and interesting. The students most important job is to tell who is speaking and why. They should include information that will catch the attention of the audience and that is complimentary to the speaker. Students should make sure all words are pronounced correctly, especially the speakers name, which should be mentioned at the beginning and at the end.
Some teaching suggestions for practising introductions include:
Interviews
An interview can often be an effective method of obtaining information. Students will be interviewed whenever they apply for work. Many of them will become the interviewers in the future.
When students are involved in research prior to an interview, they should:
Some activities for practising interviews are as follows:
Teachers or students can identify possible jobs using want ads or government publications. With a partner, students list questions that they anticipate may be asked in a particular job interview. They write answers to the questions, then take turns role playing the interview. After each interview, they should review their performance. Students can be chosen to role play good interview technique for the whole group.
At the beginning of a course, students prepare questions to ask a peer. They interview the person and, with that information, introduce their partner to the class. A variation would have students presenting an award to their partner (e.g., most likely to succeed in the hockey world, the next Oscar-winning actor, the top engineering graduate). Props, such as home made trophies, can be presented.
Students can role play characters from literature and the media. For example, Oprah interviews Polonius concerning the relationship between Ophelia and Hamlet, or Jay Leno interviews Jem Finch ten years after To Kill a Mockingbird ends.
With a partner, students can prepare and conduct a mock telephone interview with a well-known author, sports figure, or literary character.
Media interviews: This type of interview is an important tool for journalists and can be easily used for the study of interviewing techniques.
Job interviews: Most students will participate in job interviews at some point in their lives. The interview gives the employer an opportunity to form a first-hand impression of applicants and, therefore, it is important to create a good impression. Students need to be prepared for a job interview. They should:
Some activities for practising interviews are as follows:
Panel discussions
Panel discussions occur when a group discusses an issue by pooling its knowledge and working toward a solution. Panel discussions encourage the sharing of different views. They encourage participants and audience to adopt an attitude of inquiry. They also allow for audience participation. A panel is usually made up of three to seven people and the format is similar to the following:
Some teaching suggestions for panel discussions follow:
Student One: Provide the introduction and biographical information.
Students Two, Three, and Four: Discuss the authors work and critiques of the work.
Student Five: Give an overview of the authors contributions and a conclusion.
Students present their findings in a panel format. Time guidelines (e.g., 15-20 minutes per group) are given. Teachers may also ask for a written submission--sources, notes, outline.
Symposiums
Symposiums are formal public discussions in which individuals present speeches giving their own views on a pre-selected topic or question. The topic is open to debate and the goal of the symposium is to explore the question and to consider various perspectives and possible answers. In contrast with an informal discussion and panel discussion, the participants prepare and present formal speeches based on their independent research, rather than speaking spontaneously in response to questions from the leader or moderator.
Each participant prepares a formal speech based on his or her research. The moderator introduces the symposium and each speaker, leads the discussions that follow the individual presentations, and summarizes the symposium.
Business meetings
Business meetings are structured discussions which lead to group decisions. Most students will be involved in numerous organizations during their lifetimes and will benefit from knowing the basics of parliamentary procedure, which allows for meetings to run smoothly and efficiently. Students should be aware that formal meetings usually follow this pattern:
Students can benefit from learning the terminology of business meetings and practising such aspects as planning an agenda, chairing a meeting, writing minutes, making and amending motions, voting, and addressing the chair. Students must accept responsibility to contribute and listen to the contributions of others. They must strive to stick to the topic at hand and respect the chairpersons authority.
Students often have difficulty with the format of making motions. A motion leads to a group decision through the following process:
Roberts Rules of Order or similar documents provide further information on amending and tabling motions.
Some teaching suggestions for business meetings are:
Formal Speeches
A formal speech is a spoken essay and, like an essay, it can be used to inform or explain, to persuade, or to entertain. Effective speeches are carefully prepared, thoroughly rehearsed, sincere, and energetically delivered. Students should always consider audience, purpose, and situation. They should use appropriate language and verbal and nonverbal presentation elements for their audience, in order to communicate effectively and show respect for their audience.
Illustrated talks
An illustrated talk or report involves the co-ordination of spoken and visual materials. Students might use posters, charts, graphs, slides, video, overhead projector, chalkboard, props, or handouts. The following guidelines can help make their talk effective:
Some teaching suggestions include:
Announcements
An announcement is a short statement designed to give information and arouse interest. Announcements are like the leads of news stories in that they answer the five "Ws" (who, what, when, where, and why). As announcements are common in school and out, students can benefit from some experience in this area.
Students should:
If using a microphone, students should know microphone technique:
Some teaching ideas include:
Assessing formal speaking is a complex process. Teachers should be sensitive to the many factors involved in public speaking. Teachers should not expect perfection but should take students from where they are and help them become more effective public speakers. Teachers may need to adapt assessment instruments to accommodate students from different linguistic or cultural backgrounds. They should consider the purpose of the activity and provide an appropriate amount of feedback for the assignment.
Hook and Evans (1982) suggest a possible method for appraising individuals contributions to panel discussions that would work well with discussions of almost any type. They suggest that teachers keep a tally sheet and mark each time a student speaks. A plus (+) indicates a helpful contribution, a zero (0) indicates a neutral one, and a minus (-) indicates a contribution that is "digressing, sidetracking, blocking, or overly aggressive" (p. 435). For example,
Student One: 0+++000000
Student Two: ++++
Student Three: 00--0--
Student Four: 000++
The forms on the following pages can be adapted for assessment of Group II Speaking Activities:
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Introducing a Speaker
Name: __________________________________ Date: __________________________
Circle a mark for each section. Excellent is 10. Poor is 1. The other numbers are somewhere between. For instance, 5 or 6 would be average.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments:
(Booth, Cameron, & Lashmar, Vol. 2, 1986, p. 62. Reproduced with the permission of Prentice Hall Canada Inc.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Research Interview
Subject: ______________________________________ Date: ______________________
Interviewer: __________________________________
Interviewee: __________________________________
P = poor A = average G = good E = excellent
|
The Interviewer |
P |
A |
G |
E |
Comments |
|
established a friendly attitude | |||||
|
spoke clearly and audibly | |||||
|
asked clear and direct questions | |||||
|
sequenced questions effectively | |||||
|
listened well | |||||
|
offered encouragement and support | |||||
|
allowed silence or wait time after questions and |
Strengths of this interview (identify two):
Target for improvement (identify one):
Additional Comments:
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Group Presentation
| Group Members:
1. 2. 3. 4. |
Date: |
|
|
|
| Aspects of Presentation | Teacher's Observations | Rating |
| Content |
4 Insightful, Provocative 3 Focused, Substantial 2 Adequate, Practical 1 Sketchy, Disorganized |
|
| Language |
4 Rich, Memorable 3 Precise, Well Chosen, 2 Clear, Adequate 1 Vague, Minimal |
|
| Presentation/ Delivery Style | 4 Exciting, Sophisticated 3 Smooth, Polished 2 Competent, Adequate 1 Unenthusiastic, Inconsistent |
|
| Overall Rating | ||
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Rubric for Group Presentation
| Content | Language | Presentation/Delivery Style | |
4 |
Insightful, Provocative
Intent/Purpose - clear, articulate statement of purpose and subject; captivates audience and focuses topic Position - strong, well-defined with relevant, accurate, specific details that explain or support the position Organization - explanations and descriptions clear, memorable and cohesive; may introduce a new perspective Conclusion - conclusions clearly stated and substantially supported |
Rich, Memorable
Intent/Purpose - point of view clear; development or support conclusive or complete; consistently speaks sensitively of others Clarity - creates clarity and understanding by using vivid, precise, accurate language Structure - all statements structurally correct and interrelated Language Choice - word pictures and phrases reflect the personality of the group; uses innovative, precise, and varied word choices |
Exciting, Sophisticated
Poise - relaxed, self-confident, self-composed Voice - fluctuation in volume and inflection helps maintain audience interest and emphasize key points Pacing - effective use of pause giving sense of drama; length of presentation matches allotted time Awareness of Audience - excellent suitability of speech content and delivery to the audience's knowledge, interest, and need Body Language - natural movement and descriptive gestures display energy, create mood, and help audience visualize |
3 |
Perceptive, Substantial
Intent/Purpose - introduction has strong purpose statement Position - clear position with appropriate, substantial details that explain/support position Organization - explanations and descriptions focused and cohesive Conclusion - conclusions supported by data or evidence |
Precise, Well Chosen
Intent/Purpose - point of view clear, with support coming from a variety of sources; usually speaks sensitively of others Clarity - uses clear, specific language with few errors Structure - most statements structurally correct and related to the topic Language Choice - choice and arrangement of words reflect the personality of the group; uses descriptive or humorous language to achieve effects |
Smooth, Polished
Poise - quick recovery from moments of occasional tension Voice - uses variation of tone, volume, and inflection Pacing - pattern of delivery successful; length matches allotted time Awareness of Audience - good suitability of speech content and delivery to audience knowledge, interest, and need; may use humour Body Language - movements and gestures generally enhance delivery |
3 |
Adequate, Practical
Intent/Purpose - introductory statement informs, gives general purpose of presentation Position - definite but general position, some support offered Organization - explanations and descriptions utilitarian and generally accurate; supported by examples, facts, and/or statistics Conclusion - conclusions stated and minimally substantiated |
Clear, Adequate
Intent/Purpose - clarity of point of view attempted, using some supporting data Clarity - for the most part, uses clear, accurate language with some errors Structure - speech and diction adequate; a few lapses in sentence structure and grammar may be present Language Choice - avoids awkward phrases and wordiness; may attempt to use descriptive or humorous language |
Competent, Adequate
Poise - attempts to maintain self-composure Voice - includes some variation of tone, volume, and inflection Pacing - pattern of delivery generally successful; slight mismatch between length and allotted time Awareness of Audience - message reflects limited awareness of audience; may refer to common interests and experiences Body Language - uses appropriate but minimal or slightly exaggerated body language |
1 |
Sketchy, Disorganized
Intent/Purpose - purpose of presentation not clearly stated in introduction; or introductory statement missing completely Position - some information given, may not directly relate to topic; may be presented in disorganized pieces giving vague idea of position Organization - explanations and descriptions incomplete or confusing; may use opinion as fact Conclusion - very thin data/evidence in support of ideas/conclusions; partial summary of major ideas; or presentation may stop abruptly without giving summary |
Vague, Minimal
Intent/Purpose - point of view may not be clearly communicated to the audience; may speak insensitively of others Clarity - uses vague or general language; at times, may be inaccurate Structure - sentence structure may be awkward, unclear, or even unfinished; grammatical and structural errors present Language Choice - uses familiar generalized language; frequently repeats a favourite word(s) or phrase(s) |
Unenthusiastic, Inconsistent
Poise - minimal self-composure; or may demonstrate indifference Voice - uneven volume with little or no inflection and/or monotonous tone Pacing - uneven or inappropriate patterns of delivery; length does not match allotted time Awareness of Audience - message reflects little awareness of audience; occasionally off-target Body Language - insufficient movement and/or awkward gestures may impede effectiveness of presentation |
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Panel Discussions
Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., rate) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.
For each item listed, circle a mark out of 10.
|
Name of Student: ______________________________ |
Date: ________________ |
|
1. Preparation (research, background reading) |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
2. Ability to persuade |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
3. Contribution to group learning |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
4. Ability to listen (concentration, understanding) |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
5. Clearness of ideas presented |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
6. Use of important details to support statements made |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
7. Effectiveness of delivery (volume, rate, gestures) |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
8. Effective use of language (word choice, grammar, sentence structure) |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
9. Overall organization (introduction, body, conclusion) |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
10. Responses to questions |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
Now total the marks you circled. ______
Comments: Signature of Evaluator ____________________________________ | |
(Booth, Cameron, & Lashmar, 1986, p. 62. Reproduced with the permission of Prentice Hall Canada Inc.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Individual Profile for a Business Meeting
Name: _________________________________________________________
Date: __________________________________________________________
|
Yes |
No | |
|
Arrives early or on time | ||
|
Is prepared | ||
|
Has adequate knowledge of procedures | ||
|
Assists chairperson to facilitate | ||
|
Participates but does not monopolize | ||
|
Is courteous and attentive | ||
|
Takes part in discussion and decisions | ||
|
Comments:
|
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Formal Speaking: Form One
Speaker: _________________________ Date of Presentation: _____________________
Some of the items listed below (e.g., eye contact, pacing, expression) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.
|
For each item, check the box with the most accurate description. | |||
|
Presentation |
Poor |
Satisfactory |
Good |
|
Volume. Was the speakers voice loud enough? |
Too loud or too soft |
Usually loud enough |
Easily heard, with voice loud or soft as required |
|
Diction. Were the speakers words easy to understand? |
Mumbling or monotonous |
Usually understandable |
Clear, easily understood |
|
Pacing. Was the speakers speed appropriate? |
Too fast or too slow |
Speed usually good |
Good speed, going fast or slow to fit material |
|
Eye Contact. Did the speaker use eye contact effectively? |
Little or no eye contact |
Some eye contact |
Appropriate eye contact |
|
Gestures. Did the speaker use appropriate body movements that contributed to your understanding of the meaning? |
No gestures used |
Occasional gestures used |
Gestures used appropriately |
|
Expression. Did the speakers voice express feeling? |
Little or no expression |
Some expression |
Consistently expressed appropriate feeling |
|
Understanding of material. Did the speaker indicate an understanding of the material? |
Uncertain or confused delivery |
Usually in control |
Strong, purposeful presentation |
|
Effect on audience. Did the speaker make it easy for you to understand and have an interest in what was said? |
No enthusiasm, dull |
Showed enthusiasm and sincerity |
Created enthusiasm or other appropriate feeling in audience |
|
Content and Organization |
Poor |
Satisfactory |
Good |
|
Introduction. Did the speaker let you know immediately what the speech would be about? |
Introduction dull, confusing |
Made topic clear |
Made topic clear and created interest in it quickly |
|
Body of speech. Did the speaker lead you steadily from one idea to the next with examples, where needed? |
Disorganized, confused |
Ideas seemed to be connected |
Well organized, maintained high interest |
|
Summary of conclusion. Did the speaker pull together all the ideas of the speech and end it logically? |
Trailed off at the end |
Let you know the speech was over |
Tied up all loose ends but left you wanting to hear more |
(Adapted from Shaparro & Trost, 1985, p. 29. Used by permission of McDougal, Littell and Co.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Formal Speaking: Form Two
Speaker: _______________________________________ Date: ___________________
Topic: _________________________________________ Audience: ________________
Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., pronunciation, rate, eye contact) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.
Students could be given the option to weight their delivery more or less than the content of their presentation (e.g., 60 percent for content and 40 percent for delivery or vice versa). The teacher might also vary the allocations depending on the focus of learning.
|
Comments |
Score | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Content (list criteria):
| /50
|
| Organization
| /10
| Voice
| /10
| Body Language
| /10
| Persuasion and Interest
| /10
| Other Remarks
| /10
| /100 | |||||||||
Group III: Activities for More Limited Types of Speech
Group III speaking experiences are those required during special situations in life. In English language arts courses, they are used primarily to further the understanding and appreciation of issues.
Debating
Debating is a discussion of the arguments for and against something and can be either formal or informal. Even two people can have a debate. A useful classroom debate format follows:
Debates can be structured so they involve an entire class. Cruchley (1984) developed the following format for a full-class debate:
The chairperson keeps a running tally of points accumulated.
Activities to practise debating might include:
In formal debates, attention must be paid to conventions and time lines.
Drama
Drama can play an important role in the language arts classroom. Through imaginative role playing, and voice and movement exercises, students can use drama as a basis for learning. They can express themselves, experiment with new ideas, respond to situations, develop understanding, concentrate, and gain confidence.
Role playing and improvisation: These are the bases of much drama. Choral reading, readers theatre, and play reading can all grow from them. Role playing is pretending that one is another person. Students attempt to think, act, speak, and react as they think that person would. An improvisation is a dramatic representation that has been composed and presented on the spur of the moment. There is no script and the direction the improvisation takes depends upon the students interpretation of character. Role playing and improvisation may arise from literary selections (e.g., Dracula meets Lady Macbeth) or they may arise from issues (e.g., a clerk accuses a teenager of stealing).
There are many possibilities for role playing and improvisation in the language arts. For example:
Choral Reading
Choral reading is oral reading in unison with others. (This activity is called choral speaking when students recite rather than read a selection.) Choral reading works particularly well with poetry. Participation in choral reading helps students imp rove their literary interpretation and oral reading as they practise their articulation, breathing, and vocal flexibility. They learn to co-operate as their voices blend or harmonize with others. As students select a piece of literature and prepare it f or presentation, they need to consider four questions in order to produce the desired interpretation:
Three possible choral reading/speaking arrangements for poetry are:
Students can explore different combinations of these patterns.
Readers Theatre
Readers theatre is a dramatic form in which students read aloud from scripts. Ideas and emotions are conveyed through vocal expression with a minimal use of props and gestures. The focus is on the vocal rather than the visual. Readers theatre benefits both audience and performers. The audience is stimulated intellectually and emotionally by the performance; the performers are challenged to use their imagination and voice. Stories, diaries, essays, poems, plays, and novel segments lend themselves t o readers theatre. Because it does not rely on scenery or other visual props, readers theatre can be performed anywhere. It can be staged in a number of ways. See the examples on the following page.
Readers theatre can be very useful to English language arts teachers because it presents literature without all the complexities involved in an actual stage production. In adapting literature to readers theatre, students should consider the following criteria:
(Tanner, 1991, p. 344. Used with permission of Clark Publishing Co.)
Chamber Theatre is a variation of readers theatre. A narrator is used and other members of the group act out what the narrator is saying. Some possibilities for readers theatre and chamber theatre include A Christmas Carol, Our Town, A Rope Against the Sun, and The Last Night of the World.
Plays, of course, are written to be heard. When students read plays aloud their voices should reflect an appropriate interpretation.
Assessment of Group III Speaking Activities
The assessment forms on the following pages can be adapted and used by teachers, students, or peers when evaluating Group III speaking activities:
Sample Assessment Form for Debate
Sample Parliamentary Debate Assessment
Sample Assessment for Role Playing
Sample Assessment for Choral Reading
Sample Assessment for Readers Theatre.
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment Form for Debate
This form can be used for the assessment of an individual or a team by self, peers, or teacher.
Rating scales: Superior - 1, Excellent - 2, Good - 3, Fair - 4, Poor - 5
Debater(s):
|
Rating |
Comments | |
|
Organization of own case
| ||
|
Analysis of the debate issues
| ||
|
Use of evidence (examples, authority,
| ||
|
Refutation and rebuttal
| ||
|
Asking questions
| ||
|
Answering questions
|
(Adapted from Hanks, 1975, p. 81. Used with permission of J. Weston Walch Publisher.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Parliamentary Debate Assessment
Debaters: ____________________________________________________
Date: _____________________________
| (Government Leader) | Low High |
| |
|
Analysis
Evidence Organization Delivery Total _____ | 1 2 3 4 5 | ||
| First Speaker (Negative) | |||
|
Analysis
Evidence Organization Delivery Total _____ | 1 2 3 4 5 | ||
| Second Speaker (Affirmative) | |||
|
Analysis
Evidence Organization Delivery Total _____ | 1 2 3 4 5 | ||
| Second Speaker (Negative) | |||
|
Analysis
Evidence Organization Delivery Total _____ | 1 2 3 4 5 | ||
| Third Speaker (Affirmative) | |||
|
Analysis
Evidence Organization Delivery Total _____ | 1 2 3 4 5 | ||
| Third Speaker (Negative) | |||
|
Analysis
Evidence Organization Delivery Total _____ | 1 2 3 4 5 |
(Mowbray & George, 1992, pp. 67-68. Used with permission of Pembroke Publishers Ltd.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Role Playing
Students Name: _________________________________________
Date: _________________________________
|
1. Communicated character
|
Low High
|
|
2. Became immediately involved in scene
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
3. Sustained characterization
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
4. Spoke clearly
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
5. Used appropriate dialogue
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
6. Gestured and moved in character
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
7. Maintained concentration
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
Overall effect
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Choral Reading
Students Name: _______________________________ Date: _____________________
Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., pronunciation, eye contact) can vary across cultures and in accordance with the situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students 146; speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.
Rate students work in rehearsal and performance of choral reading according to the following rating and criteria.
P = Poor A = Average G = Good E = Excellent
|
Attitude |
P |
A |
G |
E |
|
Co-operated with director | ||||
|
Co-operated with the group | ||||
|
Worked seriously on part | ||||
|
Accepted constructive criticism | ||||
|
Was constantly alert to the material | ||||
|
Contributed to a unified whole | ||||
|
Memorization (if used) | ||||
|
Memorized part correctly | ||||
|
Memorized part by deadline | ||||
|
Voice | ||||
|
Enunciated words clearly | ||||
|
Pronounced words correctly | ||||
|
Projected well | ||||
|
Adjusted voice to selection | ||||
|
Body | ||||
|
Adjusted facial expression to material | ||||
|
Adjusted body response to material | ||||
|
Used appropriate eye contact | ||||
|
Scripts (if used) | ||||
|
Handled scripts unobtrusively |
(Tanner, 1991, p. 337. Used with permission of Clark Publishing Co.)
Printing and copying this template requires Acrobat Reader
Sample Assessment for Readers Theatre
Students Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________
Some of the items listed in this checklist (e.g., pronunciation, rate, eye focus) can vary across cultures and in accordance with situation. Teachers should also be aware of second language and dialectical differences that can be present in students 146; speech, and adapt their assessment instruments accordingly.
Rate students work in rehearsal and performance of a readers theatre program according to the following rating and criteria: P = poor A = average G = good E = excellent
|
Attitude |
P |
A |
G |
E |
|
Co-operated with director | ||||
|
Co-operated with the group | ||||
|
Worked seriously on part | ||||
|
Accepted suggestions | ||||
|
Was constantly alert to the material | ||||
|
Contributed to a unified whole | ||||
|
Voice | ||||
|
Adjusted voice to suggest the role | ||||
|
Used adequate volume | ||||
|
Used appropriate rate | ||||
|
Enunciated words clearly | ||||
|
Pronounced words correctly | ||||
|
Body | ||||
|
Adjusted facial expression to the role | ||||
|
Adjusted physical response to the role | ||||
|
Maintained appropriate eye focus | ||||
|
Handled script unobtrusively | ||||
|
Characterization | ||||
|
Developed role into distinct, convincing person | ||||
|
Maintained character | ||||
|
Reflected characters motivation through movement | ||||
|
Projected effective degree of emotion | ||||
|
Maintained spontaneity |
Comments:
(Adapted from Tanner, 1991, p. 34. Used with permission of Clark Publishing Co.)
Speech activities related to specialized situations (e.g., toasts, election speeches, acceptance speeches, etc.) can help prepare students for entering certain professions. However,
Teaching the types of speaking needed for professional work is primarily the responsibility of the college or vocational school, not of the high school. The foundation for the specialized speech required of a salesperson or minister are laid in the elementary and high schools, but detailed work is possible only later, when one enters his or her vocation (Hook & Evans, 1982, p. 436).
If there is a natural opportunity for practising Group IV speech activities, teachers should seize that opportunity. For instance, as students approach graduation, teachers may help them with their addresses and toasts.
Oral communication should be at the heart of the curriculum. It is neither difficult nor expensive for teachers to improve the communication climate of their classrooms to help students learn more effectively.