| F.Y.I. Middle Level Health Education is based on the Decision-making Process described in the Introduction in this guide. This process provides the organizational framework for each unit. The course is taught, learned, and evaluated through the three levels o f Extend Knowledge Base, Make an Informed Decision, and Carry Out Action Plan. This unit introduces students to the process. It is essential that it be taught first, at the beginning of the school year. In this unit, students learn the skills of accessing multiple sources of information, evaluating sources of information, and eva luating health-related information. Students learn the fundamental skills of decision making. They learn to generate a full range of alternatives or choices and then make a judgement based upon appropriate criteria. The skills of establishing goals that a re attainable and measurable are included in this unit. Lastly, students learn to design action plans to attain their goals. They also learn how to evaluate the design elements of their plan and their personal progress. |
Time Frame
This unit will take approximately three to four hours to complete.
Foundational Objectives and Learning Objectives
Level A - Extend Knowledge Base |
Foundational Objectives
Students will understand the role of personal standards in applying health-related information to daily living.
Students will acquire and evaluate multiple sources of health-related information.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Level B - Make an Informed Decision |
Foundational Objectives
Students will develop the lifelong practice of making health-enhancing decisions.
Students will acknowledge the role of personal standards in decision making.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
| Level C - Carry Out Action Plan |
Foundational Objective
Students will practise planning for responsible health action.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
| Decision-making Process | Content | Resources |
| Level A - Extend Knowledge Base 1. Reflect on what you know about the issue. 2. Research the issue. Find the facts. | Overview of content and perspective for the year Personal standards Health-enhancing and health-risking behaviours Six-step Decision-making Process Identifying sources of information and evaluating them Evaluating health-related information | Choices: A Teen Woman's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning Challenges: A Young Man's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning Checklist for Evaluating Health-related Sources of Information Checklist for Evaluating Health-related Information |
| Level B - Make an Informed Decision 3. State the challenge. Explore alternatives and consequences. 4. Make a decision. Set a personal goal. | Stating a challenge related to personal standards at risk Identifying factors that affect decision making Models of decision making Identifying short-term and long-term consequences Formulating goal statements | Choices: A Teen Woman's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning Challenges: A Young Man's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning Healthwise 1 |
| Level C - Carry Out Action Plan 5. Design and apply an action plan. 6. Evaluate progress. Revise as needed. | Identifying elements of a well-designed action plan Designing action plans to affirm personal standards Identifying traits of a support person who can affirm personal standards Establishing criteria for evaluating the design elements of action plans |
Note: For further information about the titles listed in the 'Resources' column,
please see the Middle Level Health Education bibliography.
Learning Objectives Students will identify examples of health-enhancing and health-risking behaviours. Students will give examples of personal standards. |
| Instructional Strategies/Methods |
Teaching Notes | ||
| Direct Instruction: structured overview |
Provide students with a list of the required units
or topics for Grade 6 Health Education and the optional units to be included.
Optional units may be selected based upon student need, community need,
teacher expertise, availability of resources, or stude nt interest.
Review the themes used in Health Education throughout the Elementary Level:
Inform students that the theme or perspective for Grade 6 Health Education is Affirming Standards. |
||
| Direct Instruction: |
Use a talking circle or circle of knowledge to explore the topic of personal standards. As students offer their ideas one at a time, record them on the chalkboard or flipchart. This practice is especially helpful for students who are visual learners. Two resources that can be used in this review of personal standards are Choices: A Teen Woman's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning and Challenges: A Young Man's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning. In these res ources, personal standards are grouped in the following categories:
Conclude the activities concerning personal standards by suggesting that personal standards affect our behaviours. For example, if we value family, friendship, and companionship and we believe in respect for persons, we do not pick on or bully another person. |
||
| Direct Instruction: structured overview and Interactive Instruction: brainstorming |
Explain that 'Health Action', a term that applies to Health Education, means the appropriate and responsible application of health-related information in various aspects of daily living. Explain to students that the Health Action program is a practical course aimed at helping students enhance their present health status and decrease their risk for disease and disability. The course focuses on ways students might apply Health Education in their daily lives by increasing 'health-enhancing' behaviours and reducing 'health-risking' behaviours. Explain that the title Health Action was chosen to focus on what people can DO to improve their own health. Ask students to brainstorm a list of health-enhancing behaviours. The list is likely to include:
Continue by having students brainstorm a list of health-risking behaviours. The list will include opposites of the above, but might also include:
|
||
| Indirect Instruction: personal reflection |
Have students imagine that their day, yesterday, was video taped. Suggest that students replay the imaginary video and make two lists as they reflect on their previous day. One is a list of activities that 'contribute to my health' and the other is a l ist of activities that 'place my health at risk'. The list might include:
|
||
| Direct Instruction: structured overview |
Prepare a wall-sized chart of the six-step Decision-making Process and use it as a visual support while explaining that, during the year, students will :
Post the wall chart. It will be used throughout this unit and throughout the year. |
| Student Assessment Techniques Providing the students with short case studies or scenarios and asking them to 'identify' the health-enhancing and health-risking behaviours is one way to assess the degree to which they have met this objective. The second learning objective is to 'give examples' of personal standards. Teachers can assess students by asking them to list examples, or to draw a visual diagram or design a collage of examples. |
Learning Objectives Students will identify selection criteria and use them to evaluate sources of health-related information (CCT). Students will list strategies to use in evaluating health-related information. Students will recognize the importance of respecting facts, evidence, and views of others when engaging in rational discussions (PSVS). |
| Instructional |
Teaching Notes Refer to the wall-sized chart of the six-step Decision-making Process to indicate that students have completed Step 1: Reflect on what you know about the issue. They will now proceed toward Step 2: Research the issue. Find the facts. |
| Direct Instruction: question and answer and Interactive Instruction: discussion |
Human Resources Who would you ask for information or help if you had:
Develop the answers together, as a class. Make sure students know it is not a test. Print Resources Non-print Resources Bring closure to the discussion and connect it to the next activity through the following generalizations about sources of information:
|
| Direct Instruction: mini-lecture |
Review, from the Elementary Level of Health Education, that it is important to check the copyright date of resources to ensure that the information is current. Also, it is a good idea to check and see if the author's credentials are clearly visible to the consumer. Introduce additional criteria to be used in selecting reliable resources. Emphasize that you are concentrating on the source of information. Introduce three key organizers: author, source, and information. These organizers are introduced here an d added to throughout the Middle Level to evaluate health-related information. Author
Source
Information
|
| Direct Instruction: demonstration |
Introduce the Sample Checklist for Evaluating Health-related Sources of Information provided as Appendix 6-A. Use three or four teacher-selected resources to demonstrate the use of the checklist. It may be valuable to sele ct one source of information that is outdated and another that is from a non-expert source. |
| Interactive Instruction: peer practice |
Bring to the classroom several resources that include references to the health-related concept of 'protection'. They might include magazine articles, pamphlets, advertisements, medical journals, student texts, and consumer reports about mouth guards to protect our teeth during activities such as hockey, sunscreen to protect our skin, and seatbelts to protect ourselves while in moving vehicles. Provide pairs of students with a resource and a checklist for evaluating sources of health-related information . Rotate the resources so each pair of students has an opportunity to evaluate two or three resources. The debriefing of this peer practice session is important. Facilitate a comparison of student findings. The value lies in students sharing with one another information such as:
Discuss with students how they decided whether an author's educational background prepared him or her to be an expert on mouth guards, seatbelts, sunscreen, etc. |
| Direct Instruction: mini-lecture or compare and contrast |
In a mini-lecture, examples of facts about mouth guards, sunscreen, and seatbelts, as substantiated by scientific evidence and reported in reliable information sources, can be presented to students. A variety of viewpoints can also be presented. In an activity of compare and contrast, students can see the similarities among facts, evidence, and views as well as the differences. Regardless of which instructional method is used, it is critical that students recognize the importance of respecting the facts, respecting evidence, and considering (although not necessarily accepting) the views of others. Remind students that as we move from childhood through adolescence toward adulthood, we may modify our personal standards as we acquire more information that is supported by sound evidence. Likewise, we may modify our personal standards if we learn tha t some of what we formerly thought of as truth turns out to be opinion, viewpoint, or unsubstantiated information. |
| Interactive Instruction: brainstorming |
Ask students to brainstorm a list of strategies they might use to evaluate information about mouth guards, sunscreen, seatbelts, or any health-related information. Examples might include:
A Sample Checklist for Evaluating Health-related Information is provided as Appendix 6-B. It includes such strategies as:
Students may suggest adding others such as:
|
| Interactive Instruction: peer practice |
Using the same peer partners, have students use the criteria provided, along with criteria they may wish to add, in order to evaluate the information contained in the two or three resources they originally evaluated as sources of information. Ensure th at students understand that they are using the same resources but they are using different criteria for a different purpose. This time, they are not evaluating the source of the information. Rather, they are evaluating the information contained within the resource. Draw students' attention to the wall-sized chart of the Decision-making Process. Indicate that they have begun to acquire the skills of researching an issue and finding the facts based upon current and accurate information. Indicate ways in which their skills will be assessed for Level A of the Decision-making Process and for Level B as students enter into Steps 3 and 4. |
| Student Assessment Techniques Present each student with a source of health-related information (e.g., journal article, magazine article, or book). Ask each student to use the Sample Checklist for Evaluating Health-related Sources of Information (Grade 6), or one they created as a class, to evaluate the resource as a source of health-related information. To assess students' abilities to identify facts, evidence, viewpoints, testimonials, unsubstantiated claims, ambiguous statements, generalizations, purpose or intent, and so on, provide them with examples and non-examples and ask them to identify the e xamples. Student Evaluation Techniques for Level A of Decision-making Process
|
Learning Objectives Students will identify factors that affect decision making. Students will identify similarities and differences in decision-making models. Students will identify short-term consequences and long-term consequences. Students will establish personal goals that affirm personal standards. |
| Instructional Strategies/Methods |
Teaching Notes |
||
| Direct Instruction: structured overview |
Inform students that the next class period or two will be spent concentrating on the skills to be developed in Level B of the Decision-making Process. Point out Steps 3 and 4 on the wall chart. |
||
| Interactive Instruction: brainstorming |
Review the examples of personal standards as listed by students in Level A. Ask students to generate a list of times, places, or situations when their personal standards might be at risk.
|
||
| Interactive Instruction: |
Ask students each to list some of the decisions they make every day. In pairs, ask students to identify some of the decisions they make regularly that have to do with their health and well-being. Move two pairs together to become a small group of four and ask students to list factors that affect decision making. Debrief the Think-Pair-Share activity by examining the groups' collective list of factors that affect decision making. The collective list may be grouped into broader factors such as the following:
|
||
| Direct Instruction: mini-lecture or compare and contrast |
Present several models of decision making.
Begin by including the Decision-making Process used in the elementary
grades: Level B: Make an Informed Decision Level C: Carry Out an Action Plan Choice: A Teen Woman's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning and Challenges: A Young Man's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning provide a detailed model in chapter five of each title. Healthwise 1 includes co nsiderable information on the decision-making process and provides a step by step model. Be sure to refer to the Decision-making Process of Middle Level Health Education, as posted in the classroom. Ask students to identify how it expands on the process they used in the Elementary Level. Encourage students to see that the Health Education model differs from some others because it does not begin with identifying a decision to be made or a problem to be solved. Instead, the Decision-making Process begins with gathering information and ev aluating both the sources of information and the information itself. By becoming well informed on the topic at hand, individual students are better equipped to focus on an element of the topic or issue that is of real concern to them. This individualizing is accommodated in Step 3: State the challenge. Conclude by explaining that decision making is a complex process. Assure students that they will encounter various decision-making models in their reading and that some models emphasize certain aspects of the process while others emphasize other aspect s. Remind students that decision-making models can provide guidance but it is unlikely that any one system captures all the subtleties involved in the process of making decisions. The Health Education Decision-making Process is a rational model of making decisions based upon accurate and up-to-date information. |
||
| Interactive Instruction: discussion |
Lead into the next part of the unit asking students to consider the consequences of not making informed decisions. |
||
| Interactive Instruction: co-operative learning groups |
Divide the class into four small groups. Arrange for students to take the roles of recorder, reporter, and time keeper. Have each group discuss and record their ideas about one of the following:
Debrief the small group discussion by comparing short-term consequences and long-term consequences. |
||
| Direct Instruction: mini-lecture and demonstration |
Throughout Elementary Level Health Education, students practised making decisions and designing action plans to carry out their decisions. At the Middle Level, students not only make decisions but also set specific goals and then design action plans to meet the goals. A mini-lecture is one way to inform students about setting goals. Key points include:
Choice: A Teen Woman's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning and Challenges: A Young Man's Journal for Self-awareness and Personal Planning provide information on setting goals in chapter four of each resource. Setting goals is referred to in chapter 2 of Healthwise 1. To clarify setting goals, students might write goal statements about protecting themselves and using mouth guards, sunscreen, and seatbelts as mechanisms to that end. Demonstrate by defining goals that answer the following questions:
|
||
| Interactive Instruction: peer practice |
Review the concept of personal standards. Provide pairs of students with a card that identifies a specific personal standard and a type of personal protection (e g., money, mouth guard; adventure, sunscreen; family, seatbelt; independence, seatbelts; b eauty, mouth guard; knowledge, sunscreen). Have students create a goal statement about personal responsibility for protection that reflects personal standards. |
||
| Indirect Instruction: concept attainment |
If students seem to need further information or assistance in writing goal statements that reflect personal standards, a concept attainment activity may prove beneficial. Concept attainment can also be used as an effective assessment strategy to help t eachers determine whether students have grasped the concept and are ready to proceed to Level C, Carry Out Action Plan. |
| Student Assessment Techniques To assess a student's understanding of the first two learning objectives in Level B, the student might create a paragraph or scenario in writing or on an audio tape outlining a situation when an adolescent's personal standards might be at risk. The st udent might also outline the accompanying factors that affect the adolescent's decision making in such a situation. If some grade 6 students are not ready to create a scenario, it may be more appropriate to provide them with a scenario or case study, and ask them to identify the personal standard(s) that are at risk and the factors that affected the adolescent's decision making. In the third learning objective, students are 'to identify' similarities and differences in decision-making models. If students created a scenario above, use the same scenario and have students suggest at least two alternatives and then generate a list ing of short-term consequences and long-term consequences for each alternative. If the students were provided with a scenario, it might include two alternatives and they can still be asked to identify consequences. Students can also compare the decision-m aking model used in the scenario with another decision-making model with which they are familiar. If the concept attainment activity was used to solidify the skill of writing goal statements that reflect personal standards, it can be used as an assessment strategy. Student Evaluation Techniques for Level B of the Decision-making Process
|
Learning Objectives Students will construct clear, achievable goals, and plan to meet them (IL). Students will design an action plan that affirms personal standards. Students will identify the traits and skills of a support person who can affirm standards. Students will establish criteria and use them to assess the design elements of the action plan. |
| Instructional |
Teaching Notes |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interactive Instruction: discussion |
The learning objective about elements of a well-designed action plan may be attained through a class discussion designed to review what students have learned throughout Health Education in grades 1-5. Debrief the discussion and add any of the following elements that may have been missed:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct Instruction: demonstration |
Select one of the goal statements related to personal standards, defined by a pair of students in Level B. As a class, develop an action plan to meet that goal. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interactive Instruction: peer practice |
Provide pairs of students with a goal statement that reflects a specific personal standard (e. g., valuing family I will help my Mom and/or Dad do the dinner dishes for seven consecutive days; independence I will find out what my homework assignments are, even if I am away from school, and do them for one week). Ask student pairs to develop an action plan to meet the goal statement and to affirm the personal standard. Advise them that their action plan will be used as part of their assess ment for Level C. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interactive Instruction: talking circle/ circle of knowledge |
A talking circle or circle of knowledge is a suggested method of learning from students what they already know. In this case, it can be used to explore the traits of an effective support person. A class of grade 6 students is likely to suggest the foll owing traits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct Instruction: mini-lecture |
Debrief the talking circle by asking the students to prioritize the character traits that would be particularly important in a support person who could help them make decisions about personal standards. While prioritizing, students may refine some of t he traits in their original lists. For example, they may suggest that a support person who affirms personal standards needs to be someone who will help you sort out your personal standards, or someone who will listen to your personal standards and not try to make their standards your standards. Bring closure to this portion of the unit by advising students that a support person may be any one of the following:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interactive Instruction: discussion |
The last learning objective of this unit deals with assessing action plans. The learning objective states that students 'will establish' criteria. One way to accomplish the learning objective is to revisit the elements of an action plan that were gener ated at the beginning of Level C. List the elements of a well-designed action plan on the chalkboard or a flipchart. Proceed by having students discuss what the element of 'who' might look like in a less effective action plan and how it might look in a mo re effective action plan. Record student descriptors in two columns or categories for each element of action plans (i.e., who, what, how, why, when, where). The class generated list may look something like this:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interactive Instruction: peer practice |
In working with the third learning objective of Level C, 'Students will design an action plan that affirms personal standards', pairs of students developed an action plan to meet a goal statement and to affirm a personal standard with which they were p resented. Allow time for the same pairs of students to use these criteria to improve their original action plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interactive Instruction: peer practice |
Ask students to highlight and explain why they made the changes they did. Remind them that assessment is the process of gathering information. They assessed, or gathered information about, their action plan when they compared it to the criteria in the chart above. Assessing their action plan in the design phase, and improving it based upon their findings, is likely to improve the chances of its success at the implementation phase.
|
| Student Assessment Techniques Student Evaluation Techniques for Level C of the Decision-making Process
To arrive at a mark for the unit of study (and later for a report card) assign one third of the total mark (or grade) to each of Levels A, B, and C of the Decision-making Process. |