The Adaptive Dimension is an essential part of all educational programs. Like the Common Essential Learnings, the Adaptive Dimension is a component of Core Curriculum and is reflected in all curricula.
The
Adaptive Dimension in Core Curriculum(1992) provides teachers with a vehicle to accommodate individual needs of students by:
|
The curriculum encourages teachers to make adjustments to the environment to meet individual needs, and to identify meaningful objectives that will promote success for each student. Learning can be made more accessible by modifying the setting, the teaching method, or the material. The Adaptive Dimension allows students to participate in the learning process by offering them alternative access to, and expression of knowledge.
This concept is used to:
The Adaptive Dimension allows teachers to help students develop their potential as independent learners. Adaptations should,however, be consistent with the objectives and spirit of the curriculum.
When making adaptations, teachers might consider the following:
The Adaptive Dimension empowers the teacher and students to use available resources and various teaching/learning strategies to plan a meaningful and appropriate language acquisition program for every student. The practice of adapting curriculum content to student needs requires teachers to make decisions about the necessary changes that will include relevant,meaningful input to achieve maximum achievement by students. This curriculum guide allows for such flexibility and decision making.
Teacher's Note
|
| Six Common Essential Learnings have been identified: | |
| C | Communication |
| N | Numeracy |
| CCT | Critical and Creative Thinking |
| TL | Technological Literacy |
| PSVS | Personal and Social Values and Skills |
| IL | Independent Learning. |
| Understanding the Common Essential Learnings(1988) | |
The Indian languages curriculum offers many opportunities for incorporating the Common Essential Learnings (C.E.L.s) into instruction. Integrating the C.E.L.s into the course of language acquisition will prepare students for their learning throughout and beyond the kindergarten to Grade 12 education system. The decision to focus on particular C.E.L.s within a lesson is guided by the needs and abilities of individual students and by the particular demands of the curriculum.
It is important to incorporate the C.E.L.s in a natural manner. For example, some units may offer many opportunities to develop all of the Common Essential Learnings, others will not. On the other hand, it should be noted that developing a particular C.E.L. may also lead to the development of other C.E.L.s. This is to be expected as the Common Essential Learnings are interrelated.
It is intended that the Common Essential Learnings be developed and evaluated within subject areas. Therefore, foundational objectives for C.E.L.s are included in the guide. Since the Common Essential Learnings are not necessarily separate and discrete categories, it is anticipated that working toward the achievement of one foundational objective may contribute to the development of others. For example, many skills, understandings and abilities required for developing Communication, Numeracy and Critical Thinking are also needed for the development of Technological Literacy.
Incorporating the Common Essential Learnings into instruction has implications for the assessment of student learning. A unit which has focused on developing particular C.E.L.s should also reflect this focus when assessing student learning. If students are encouraged to think critically and creatively throughout the unit, then teachers need to develop assessment strategies for the unit which require students to demonstrate their critical and creative thinking abilities. The Common Essential Learning s are to be integrated, accommodated and incorporated within the evaluation of each content area.
It is anticipated that teachers will build from the suggestions in this guide and from their personal reflections in order to incorporate the Common Essential Learnings into Indian or Michif language instruction.
Saskatchewan Education, Training and Employment is committed to providing quality education for all students in the K-12 system. It is recognized that expectations based primarily on gender limit students' abilities to develop to their fullest potential. While some stereotypical views and practices have disappeared, others remain. It is the responsibility of schools to create an educational environment free of gender bias.
This can be facilitated by increased understanding and use of gender balanced material and non-sexist teaching strategies. Both female and male students need encouragement to explore a wide variety of options based on individual aptitudes, abilities a nd interest, rather than on gender.
However, there are certain sociological factors that must be respected when planning a curriculum on Indian languages. Most of the Indian languages of Saskatchewan have definitive morphological and syntactic structures that address gender not in an adversarial context but as a form of respect and protocol. These features are embedded within the languages and cannot be changed without altering the whole language. The curriculum encourages teachers to facilitate an integration of both views into lesson plans.
The following guidelines will assist Indian language teachers to promote gender equity.
The integration of Indian and Métis content and perspectives within the Kindergarten to Grade 12 Indian Languages curriculum fulfils a central recommendation of both the Five Year Action Plan for Native Curriculum Development, Saskatchewan Education (1984) and the Indian and Métis Education Policy from Kindergarten to Grade Twelve, Saskatchewan Education (1989).
The policy states:
Saskatchewan Education recognizes that the Indian and Métis peoples of the province are historically unique peoples and occupy a unique and rightful place in society today. Saskatchewan Education recognizes that education programs must me et the needs of Indian and Métis peoples, and that changes to existing programs are also necessary for the benefit of all students. (p. 6)
The inclusion of Indian and Métis content, perspectives and resources fosters meaningful and culturally identifiable experiences for Indian and Métis students. The inclusion of such content also promotes the development of positive attitudes in all students toward Indian and Métis peoples.
Increasing an awareness of one's own culture and the cultures of others develops a student's self-concept, promotes an appreciation of Canada's cultural mosaic, and supports universal human rights.
Saskatchewan Indian and Métis students come from diverse cultural backgrounds and social environments including northern, rural and urban areas. New curricula require a variety of teaching strategies and materials that accommodate and build upon the diversity of cultures, learning styles, and strengths of Indian and Métis students.
Teachers have a responsibility to evaluate resources for bias and to teach students to recognize such bias. Guidelines in Diverse Voices: Selecting Equitable Resources for Indian and Métis Education (Saskatchewan Education, 1992), can assist teachers and students in understanding forms of bias in resources that inaccurately portray Indian and Métis peoples.
The following four points summarize the Aboriginal content expectations for all core curricula.
| Teacher Note:
The holistic approach to language instruction represents a multicultural approach. The emphasis on student and teacher developed units affords teachers the opportunity to accommodate diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds. |
Resource-based instruction enables teachers to use a variety of resources to assist in the development of attitudes and abilities that empower independent, life-long learning. Students are given opportunities to share in the responsibility of planning relevant learning experiences to achieve goals that they set for themselves. An environment rich in resources gives students incentives to learn.
Teacher-librarians, if available, are invaluable partners in identifying resources and assisting the teacher in various ways.
The teacher should consider the following guidelines when incorporating resource-based learning into unit plans.
To meet community and student needs at the local level, provision is made within Core Curriculum for locally-determined options.
| The time allotted for Indian language instruction at the elementary and middle levels (Gr. 1 - 9) is determined locally |
At the elementary and middle levels, time for locally-determined options may be gained by reducing the time spent in one or more of the required areas up to a maximum of 20%.
At the secondary level (Gr. 10 - 12), time for such options is available through the use of credits in the elective categories.
Framework of Objectives for to 12 |
||||
| Aim | Goals | Language Acquisition | Foundational Objectives | Learning Objectives |
|
The major aim of the Indian Languages Curriculum is to graduate students who can use an Indian or Michif language to communicate effectively and confidently in various situations .
|
|
Second language acquisition theory forms the basis for teaching and evaluation strategies in this curriculum. |
The objectives include the most important understandings and abilities which are developed at each level. Unit planning and evaluation reflect the objectives. These are considered to be achievable by most students at each grade level. |
These objectives describe specific knowledge, skills and attitudes students develop as they gradually achieve the foundational objectives for each level. They also guide resource use, daily activities, classroom instruction, and authentic language experience. |