
Science writing and reading activities, as discussed in this Guide, are essential in this unit. Readings from reference books, journals, magazines, and newspapers will be the primary information gathering method employed. In order for students to assimilate this material and convey the results of their research to their classmates, writing is essential. Writing in personal, reflective journals and creating innovative reports in various formats are strategies through which students may refine their understanding of the concepts in this unit.
Examples of activities which contain writing or reading components are found in the Suggested activities section of this unit.
Science challenge, as described in this Guide, is meant to extend students' critical and creative thinking abilities in the context of the science concepts being studied. Activities involving science challenge should be incorporated into science lessons in each unit. The challenge is intended to give each student a chance to investigate an area of interest in more depth than would be possible for all students in a class to do. Science challenge is a key strategy for bringing the Adaptive Dimension to the classroom, and for encouraging independent learning. The extension phase of each lesson is an ideal place for students to create their own challenge opportunities or to choose from opportunities suggested to them.
Objectives: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2
Assessment Techniques: anecdotal records, homework, short answer test items
Instructional Method: research projects
Once questions have been recorded in the second column decide
how they will be distributed among the
groups in the classroom. Groups might volunteer to answer one or
two of particular interest to them, or
the questions written on slips of paper and drawn from a hat.
Ask the groups to prepare a short oral
presentation to the class to discuss the results of their
research. The presentation should be
supplemented with posters, diagrams or other visual aids to help
their classmates understand what
they have found out.
Factors: B16, C2, C4,
E4, F3,
G2
Assessment Techniques: group evaluation, observation
checklist, presentations
Instructional Methods: reports, reading for meaning
Which vertical line appears to be longer?
Find other line illusions and produce posters that illustrate
them. Why do these effects fool our
eyes?
Assessment Techniques: performance assessment, written
assignments
Instructional Methods: inquiry, problem solving
A science fair project from several years ago involved fish
which had been trained to come to the side of
the aquarium when the student tapped the wall of the aquarium.
How might this have been
accomplished?
This process is called conditioning. How does it relate to the
process of house-training dogs or teaching
dogs to roll over and play dead? Do you suppose that a
grasshopper could be conditioned to do
something? How about an earthworm?
Read the distance the metre stick has dropped before being
caught. You will have to decide how to
determine the end-point for the measurement. Will it be from the
end of the stick to the top of the
fingers, the bottom of the fingers or somewhere in between?
Record the result. Repeat the process,
recording the distance the stick has fallen each trial. Is there
a learning effect involved in this
procedure? If your partner doesn't catch the stick during one
trial, how would this be recorded in the
data? Does your partner's catching distance keep getting shorter
and shorter?
Bend a 2 cm by 4 cm piece of paper into the shape of
an L. Tape the strip of paper to the
50 cm mark of the meter stick so that the longer arm of the
L sticks out perpendicular to the
surface of the metre stick. Tell your partner to again hold the
index finger and thumb at the bottom of
the stick, close her eyes and catch the stick as soon as the
paper hits one finger or the other. Collect
data for a number of trials with this method, measuring the
distance from the piece of paper to where
the stick is caught. How would you report a trial when your
partner caught the stick before the paper
hit the finger? Occasionally move the paper strip to other
places along the metre stick to alter the time
between when the stick is dropped and the paper tab hits the
fingers.
Analyze the data collected from your partner's catches. What
trends are evident? How can this data be
reported as a line graph? as a bar graph? Repeat the procedure
with your partner and yourself
switching roles. Compare your results with those from one other
group. Are the results comparable or
different? Pool all data from the class and analyze the trends
in the class.
Draw a full size outline of each tongue to be tested and
determine a testing grid. Mark that grid by
number on the outline of the tongue so that for each numbered
location the result of the sweet, salty,
bitter, and sour tests may be recorded and eventually mapped
back to an outline of a tongue to show
the tasting zones.
Administer the solutions to the tongue with a dropper, placing
a small drop at each sampling location
as determined by the chart. 15 to 30 sampling locations should
be identified. Record the effect as each
drop is added. As sensitive areas are located, their extent may
be mapped by more intensive measuring
of those locations. An alternative to administering the
solutions with a dropper is to use a Q-tipț type
cotton swab.
Compare the results of the testing. Does everyone have
approximately similar areas of sensitivity to
each stimulus, or is an area that is sensitive to saltiness in
one person sensitive to sweetness in
another?