Instructional Philosophy and Strategies
Instructional Philosophy
Learning is a process in which students construct meaning as they acquire new concepts and extend their understanding of familiar concepts. By interpreting new information and applying skills strategically, learners connect new knowledge and understanding to what they already know, and they reorganize or adjust their understanding to accommodate the new information and ideas. In order for learning to be effective, students require instruction in the use of a variety of meaning-making strategies and skills.
This section of the curriculum guide explains the philosophy behind the instructional practices that are effective in helping students to comprehend and interpret what they read, hear and view. Included in this section is information about:
Concept Development
Humans organize information into meaningful patterns or networks known as schemas. These schemas represent their experiences with and understandings of a wide range of concepts.
The ease with which students learn new concepts varies depending upon their prior knowledge and experience, and their present schema with respect to the particular concept. Concepts and the words that represent them are learned most effectively if they are "anchored in the life experiences of the learner" (Frey, 1993). As students make connections with their own experiences, they develop a revised schema about the concepts under study.
Schemas, sometimes referred to as conceptual frameworks, are organized networks of knowledge and experiences about topics and concepts/ideas that create expectations as one reads, hears or views new information. Each person has his or her own schema about any concept based upon experiences with that concept. Each person adjusts his or her understanding of that concept by integrating the new information into a schema of prior knowledge.
Concept Teaching
Marland (1993) stresses that interaction, dialogue, personal involvement and experience with a concept are crucial in order for students to develop understanding of the concept. In other words, students must become active learners, creating their own meaning and understanding relative to the concepts they are attempting to learn. As well, Marland emphasizes the importance for creating an environment in which students are mutually respectful and are willing to take risks.
Children will not truly understand a concept until they have had an opportunity to reinvent it for themselves.
Piaget
Every learner has a personal schema of knowledge, experience and understanding that is organized into a framework or network that makes sense to her or him. In order to comprehend what they read, hear, or view, students must make connections between what they already understand about a concept and any new information that they encounter. As they access their prior knowledge, and use the new information to adjust, modify and reorganize their knowledge and understanding to accommodate what they have learned, students construct their own meaning of oral, written and visual text. For students who have difficulty making sense of what they read, hear or view, instruction and practice provide them with opportunities to develop these meaning-making strategies and skills.
The essence of instruction for active learning is helping students to acquire and extend their understanding of basic concepts, and to make decisions and solve problems relative to those new understandings.
To teach concepts, teachers can use the deductive or expository approach, or the inductive or inquiry approach. Both approaches include the same steps, but the sequence of the steps differs in each one.
Deductive Approach
The following steps outline the procedure when teaching about a concept using the deductive approach. Teachers should:
Inductive Approach
The following steps outline the procedure when teaching about a concept using the inductive or inquiry approach. Teachers should:
It is important that teachers monitor and assess students' concept development on a continuous basis to determine if there are misconceptions that require correction. When checking for concept understanding, teachers observe for students' abilities to:
Language in the Content Areas
Language is an essential tool for learning in all subject areas.
Communication, one of the Common Essential Learnings, focuses on the language demands of each school subject and on the teacher’s role of developing students' communication abilities in all subjects.
The C.E.L. of Communication is based on three important principles that demonstrate the relationship between language, thinking and learning. These principles are:
The Language Processes
Learners use language to receive, interpret and share ideas and information. Through the language processes--listening, speaking, reading, writing, viewing and representing—students construct meaning and develop their thinking abilities. Students use the receptive and expressive language processes to learn in all subject areas.
|
Receptive Language Processes |
|
|
Instructional strategies that support one of the receptive language processes can be adapted to enhance students’ interpretive and thinking abilities in the others. |
|
Expressive Language Processes |
|
|
Instructional strategies that support one of the expressive language processes can be adapted to enhance students’ understanding and thinking abilities in the others. |
Listening-to-Learn
Listening is an essential component of the communication process. Effective listening is more than simply hearing. Comprehending oral information is a complex process in which listeners interact with a speaker to construct meaning within the context of their experiences and knowledge. Students develop the ability to be active, effective listeners when they deliberately attend to the speaker’s message with the intention of applying or assessing the ideas or information provided.
Effective listeners:
Teachers can help students to become effective listeners by using instructional strategies that prepare them for their listening experiences, that actively engage them during listening and that clarify and extend their understanding after the listening experience.
Reading-to-Learn
As learners advance, managing content area material requires additional reading skills. Although some readers acquire effective reading strategies incidentally and automatically, others need instruction on using systematic strategies—both thinking (metacognitive) and active.
Tomlinson (1995)
Research reveals that reading is a primary vehicle or medium through which students gather information in order to expand and develop new concepts. Therefore, it is crucial that students are provided with instruction about how to make sense of the resources that they read.
In the Social Sciences, as in other content areas, instruction in reading does not mean teaching students how to read; rather it involves helping students develop strategies for reading-to-learn from their expository materials and resources.
Secondary Level students are readily able to read narrative text because that is the genre in which they have had the most experience. However, they often find it difficult to make sense of their expository materials and informational resources. Teaching reading-to-learn skills and strategies in the Social Sciences not only helps students read their expository text material, but also increases their abilities to comprehend the concepts and achieve the stated objectives.
Reading is an active process of constructing meaning. Reading-to-learn instruction in the content areas prepares students for what they will read, supports them as they access and interpret during reading, and clarifies and extends their understanding after they read. This helps them to integrate new information and ideas into their schemas in personally meaningful ways. In addition, this instruction helps students acquire new concepts and learn relevant content.
The following chart, which contrasts reading and meaning-making behaviours of proficient readers with those of ineffective readers, can be helpful as teachers strive to help students become effective readers of expository materials and resources.
Constructing meaning when reading, in other words, reading with comprehension, requires a wide range of skills and strategies. When students are reading to learn, they apply their current reading abilities, and develop other skills and strategies for comprehending and constructing meaning as they read expository text and resources.
Effective instruction in reading-to-learn increases students' abilities to:
Reading Rate
It is important to make students aware that readers use different rates of reading, depending on the purpose for reading. Once students are aware of when to use different reading rates, they can adjust their rate of reading to accommodate the density of text and purpose. The following presents three basic reading rates and suggestions for when each rate may be useful.
Skimming (readers conduct a quick overview to get the overall gist of text)
Scanning (readers glance over text in search of a specific detail) to locate a single piece of specific information (e.g., date, name, term)
Slow and Careful (readers wish to get an in-depth understanding of a passage or text to comprehend difficult or unfamiliar concepts and vocabulary (e.g., technical material that requires thorough examination and reflection)
Viewing-to-Learn
Students encounter thoughts, ideas and information by viewing, as well as by listening and reading. The viewing process is a constructive process in which students build their schema about a topic or concept.
It is important for students to have opportunities to view a variety of media formats including visuals (e.g., photographs, political cartoons, graphs, charts, maps, art), drama (e.g., role play, live theatre) and other media (e.g., videos, television documentaries, CD-ROM). Each interaction between viewer and text differs because of students’ varying prior knowledge and cultural perspectives.
Speaking-to-Learn
Oral communication is a vital learning tool in any subject area. Classroom talk is both immediate and spontaneous (e.g., discussion, group interaction), and planned and deliberate (e.g., debate, oral presentation). Through verbal and nonverbal language, students express their thoughts and understanding.
Fluency and effectiveness in speaking develop gradually with practice and instruction. As students develop their speaking proficiency, they develop self-awareness and increase their abilities to interact effectively with others. Regular opportunities to engage in informal and formal talk increase students’ thinking and oral language proficiency in many ways, including their ability to:
Writing-to-Learn
Writing-to-learn strategies help students to explore ideas and make new information, concepts and vocabulary a part of their repertoire of language knowledge and use.
Writing is a complex process that allows learners to explore thoughts and ideas by making them visible and concrete. Writing encourages thinking and learning for the following reasons:
When students are given opportunities to put information and conceptual understanding into their own words, they come to understand better what they are reading, listening to and viewing.
Representing-to-Learn
Students most often express their thoughts, ideas and information in written and oral language; however, they should also be encouraged to use visual, dramatic and multimedia formats to represent their understanding and support their written and oral messages. Representing enhances speaking and writing when students support their oral and written expressions with various materials and media (e.g., using video or audio clips and visuals to enhance an oral presentation).
Students should have opportunities to communicate using a variety of representative formats including visuals (e.g., graphic organizers, collages, illustrations, photographs), drama (e.g., role play, readers theatre, simulation) and other media (e.g., audio and video recordings, Internet web pages).
Instructional Scaffolds
The learning process, during which students construct their own meanings and explore and expand their understanding, is a very personal and individual experience. Throughout the learning process, teachers provide students with necessary instruction and support by constructing instructional scaffolds that take individuals from where they are in their understanding to the next step or stage in their learning process.
Frequently identified as the one of the most effective instructional techniques, instructional scaffolding describes a process in which students and teachers collaborate to design appropriate support as needed for individuals or groups.
The teacher’s role is one of helping students toward new learning, assisting students during the learning process and assessing the skill, process or product to determine if further instructional scaffolds are necessary.
Instructional scaffolds must be designed to bridge the gap between what learners know and what they can do and the goal or skill they are attempting to achieve.
Instructional scaffolds should be flexible and temporary. As students become proficient with new skills and processes, they add them to their personal repertoire—they internalize them. When this occurs, teachers must allow students to proceed on their own, and continue to observe for opportunities to construct new scaffolds as the need arises.
Most scaffolding is brief and immediate, and is provided on a one-to-one basis as teachers circulate to observe students actively engaged in working and learning. However, it is also necessary for teachers to anticipate possible difficulties that students may encounter within a particular activity or process, and plan instructional scaffolds that will assist them prior to, and throughout the task (e.g., steps for writing summaries, procedures for giving oral presentations, stages of the research process).
Scaffolds may be constructed for individuals, small groups or large groups, depending upon the task and the students’ needs. Mini-lessons (10-15 minutes in length) are often all that is required for students to be able to proceed with the task. Subsequent mini-lessons can be provided, as students require new information and skills to continue their learning experiences.
Instructional scaffolds can be designed to teach students a variety of processes and skills, such as how to identify main ideas and supporting details, ask questions, cooperate in groups, predict, infer, summarize, do research, solve problems and so on. The teacher provides support only for the skills or parts of the process that students are unable to complete on their own. This support decreases as students’ levels of proficiency and competence increase, although they may require further scaffolding at another point in the task or process.
Differentiated Instruction
In order to build appropriate instructional scaffolds for students, educators must acknowledge that students learn at different rates, that they differ in their ability to think abstractly or understand complex ideas, and that they have different learning styles and strengths. Based on this understanding, teachers differentiate or adapt instruction to fit each learner's needs, styles and abilities.
Differentiating instruction to meet students' needs and abilities does not mean that all students cannot explore the same concept or topic. "Covering information takes a back seat to making meaning out of important ideas" (Tomlinson, 1995, p. 21). However, all learners need learning experiences designed to enhance their learning success. Differentiating instruction means making adaptations in one or more of the following:
In a differentiated classroom, students and teachers are learners together. While teachers may know more about the subject matter at hand, they are continuously learning about how their students learn. Teachers assess students' readiness in a variety of ways and then design learning experiences based on their best understanding of students' needs and interests.
Tomlinson (1995)
Using differentiated instruction, teachers plan and use varied approaches to content, process and product in response to continuous monitoring of students' needs and abilities, recognizing that adjustments can be made as required.
The teacher's role in a differentiated classroom is that of a planner and facilitator of learning who gives students as much responsibility for their own learning as they are able to manage. In this role, teachers:
The Adaptive Dimension and Resource-based Learning are two Saskatchewan Education Core Curriculum initiatives that support differentiated instruction. See pages ??? in this curriculum guide for information about each.
Values Instruction
This curriculum provides students with learning experiences designed to help them understand some of the fundamental value positions within societies, and how they developed. While, at times, this curriculum deals with controversy, this should not be construed to mean that any belief is as good as any other belief. Even within a pluralistic society there are commonly held beliefs, and students should not be given the impression that all beliefs are equally defensible.
Exploring and examining controversial, value-laden issues encourages students to develop their own viewpoints, learn to respect others' viewpoints, and develop and apply higher order thinking skills to organize concepts and information in personally meaningful ways. Through this process, students begin to understand the role of values as the basis for making choices and decisions. From this point, students come to understand that values provide the criteria upon which traditions and organizations of society are based. Some such criteria include: human dignity, basic rights and responsibilities as defined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and respect for and acceptance of individual differences based on human dignity.
In determining what is appropriate for the student in the areas of values objectives, teachers should be aware of both family and community standards.
Educational decisions related to values objectives in the classroom should reflect family and community standards, as well as those of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In resolving conflict between these two positions, students should be encouraged to consider the consequences resulting from each position evaluated against socially constructive values.
Assessment of Values Objectives
Generally, teachers would be well advised not to evaluate value positions of students summatively. The effect of such evaluation would be to place oneself in the position of formally calling a student's values incorrect. This may be necessary on occasion in some situations relating to fundamental human rights. In most cases, however, there is such a wide variety of acceptable positions in a pluralistic society that instead of condemning, a teacher should try to pursue with the student the reasoning that lies behind the value position.
Values objectives in the curriculum guide call for the student to appreciate, understand or show concern for some aspect of social life. This is not a demand that students adopt a certain value position; rather, it is a suggestion that students should begin to understand some of the underlying moral, ethical and aesthetic implications of the social issue in question. Objectives of this sort lend themselves much more readily to informal methods of formative evaluation.
From individual, group and class discussion, teachers can get a "feel" for what students have learned about the values that have been discussed in the classroom. They are able to chart changes that occur in student values rather than making a final evaluation as to the quality of those values. These changes may be noted through the use of anecdotal records and checklists.
Students should be encouraged to develop the thinking and communications skills that allow them to develop legitimate value positions and express and defend their positions in open discussion or debate. Teachers may evaluate students' work from this perspective, provided it is clear that the evaluation is focused on the skills of thinking, logic and communication, rather than on a specific value position.
Note: A more detailed discussion of these issues can be found in Understanding the Common Essential Learnings: A Handbook for Teachers, Saskatchewan Education, 1988.
Skills Instruction
Skills should be introduced in ways that demonstrate to students how they can use these skills to accomplish tasks related to their thinking, understanding and learning, both inside and outside of the classroom. Students who recognize the usefulness of a skill will be more inclined to learn it.
Steps in skill development include:
Skills are learned most effectively when:
Assessment of Skills Objectives
It is important in evaluation to show clearly that there is a relationship or congruence between what has been taught and what is being evaluated. If an important teaching objective has focused on a specified skill (e.g., summarizing, locating information) it is the acquisition of the skill that should be assessed.
It is equally important when assessing skills that the students be asked to demonstrate in some way that they know which skill is needed in a particular situation and how to apply it. The material or situation in which the student is being asked to apply a skill should be unfamiliar.
Instructional Strategies
The following section describes a variety of instructional strategies that can be used to assist students to develop processes, skills and concepts as they strive to comprehend their course material. Teachers are encouraged to review the instructional strategies described and exemplified, selecting and using the ones that best meet the particular needs of their students and the objectives of the course.
These strategies can serve as useful scaffolds for individuals, small groups or the entire class, depending upon students' needs. Instructional scaffolds are most effective when provided to students, as they require them, within the context of what they are attempting to achieve. However, when teachers are able to anticipate students' need for particular skills or knowledge, it is effective to plan instructional mini-lessons in advance. Scaffolds are intended to be temporary structures or information. As students have the opportunity to use these strategies, they internalize them and apply them independently.
Concept Maps
Concept maps are similar to other web diagrams in that they demonstrate connections between concepts; however, the difference is that concept maps also include a descriptor to show the links among the concepts. The links are labelled to explain the relationship between the concepts, which reveals the thinking process that has created those links. Arrows may be used to describe the direction of the relationship. These can be read like a sentence to follow the mapmaker's thought patterns.
Concept maps can be used to:
When students develop concept maps, they are constructing meaning. Creating a concept map is not a linear process; it is recursive. In other words, at any time during the process, words and ideas can be added, deleted or rearranged as students recall what they know, learn new information and reflect on their understanding. While developing concept maps is a meaning-making process, some basic steps for getting started or learning the process include:
Note: Concepts are usually nouns and linking labels are usually verbs.
The concept map on the following page, begins with the concept of Rule of Law and provides an example of subsequent concepts and the linking labels.
Current Issues and Events
News sources today extend beyond newspapers to include weekly and monthly journals, radio and television news programs and documentaries, and the Internet. Researchers reveal that students who study news and current issues in school find the course material more relevant and are more likely to attend to news reports outside of school.
While teaching each of the units of study, teachers and students can watch for current news stories and issues that will assist in developing the concepts and achieve the objectives of the curriculum.
Incorporating relevant current news, both print and non-print, offers the following benefits:
The following activities are suggestions for ways that current events might be included in the curriculum. They will be most valuable to students if they are included within the context of lessons to help students develop the concepts and achieve the objectives of the curriculum.
Why is it News?
The Five Ws
Comparing Media Treatments
Voice Your Opinion: Editorials and Letters to the Editor
Political Cartoons
Newspapers frequently include political cartoons that express opinions about current issues and satirize the people involved. Analyzing and interpreting political cartoons can help students to identify other points of view on a topic, and to develop their critical thinking skills.
It is important to select news items and articles that are related to the concept(s) and/or topic(s) being developed in order to extend students’ understanding of the subject area , as well as about news formats, issues and items.
Political Cartoon Analysis Chart
|
Describe
|
|
|
Analyze
|
|
|
Make Inferences
|
|
|
Make Judgements
|
|
|
Express an Opinion
|
Debate
Debating develops students' critical and dialectical thinking, helping them to become active listeners and to respect that a variety of valid viewpoints exist on any given topics. Debates may be formal or informal in structure. Both formal and informal debates have rules and defined procedures.
Formal Debate
Formal debate has a recognized set of rules and traditional procedures. Participants attempt to present the best arguments for or against a proposal, thereby defeating the opposing team. The purpose of formal debate is to help students develop their critical and creative thinking skills, strengthen their speaking abilities and practise their active listening skills.
Assess formal debate using criteria explained to students prior to engaging them in the process.
For more information about formal debate, contact the Saskatchewan Elocution and Debate Association (SEDA) on their website at http://www.saskdebate.com.
Informal Debate
Informal debates also operate under a set of rules; however, the rules are more flexible than those of formal debate and may vary from one situation to another. The purpose of informal debates is to help students work together to understand common issues.
Some guidelines for using informal debate include:
The templates on the following pages are examples of tools that can be used to assist students and teachers as they prepare for and assess debate.
Rating Scale for Evaluating the Speakers in a Formal Debate
|
1st Affirmative Speaker |
1st Negative Speaker |
2nd Affirmative Speaker |
2nd Negative Speaker |
|
Organization and Strategy The speech should contain an effective introduction and conclusion. It should be well structured, logical and coherent. Argumentation and logic should be straightforward and relevant. As much as possible strategy and organization should complement one another. |
||||
|
Evidence Evidence may be facts, statistics and authorities offered in support of contentions. Credit should be given for thorough, relevant research. |
||||
|
Delivery The mechanics of good speech should be faithfully observed throughout: poise, quality, use of voice, effectiveness, ease of gesture, emphasis, variety and enunciation. |
||||
|
Refutation Each speaker should demonstrate ability to use evidence and logic to refute the contentions of his opponents and defend those of his own side. |
||||
|
Parliamentary Procedure Each speaker should demonstrate understanding of parliamentary procedure through adherence to the rule as well as correct, relevant use of questions, points of order, points of personal privilege and heckling. |
Judge's Decision
The debate should be awarded to the team that bests supports its contentions through logic and evidence, and best refutes the contentions of its opponents.
If neither team meets its obligations, then the debate should be awarded to the team that best demonstrates the basic skills of debate.
(Adapted with permission of Saskatchewan Elocution and Debate Association.)
Decision-making Process
Decision making is the process of determining the best choice to be made when faced with a problem or a dilemma. Students need to be able to recognize when decision-making skills are required to arrive at a preferred choice from a number of alternatives.
The following guidelines may assist students in learning and using the decision-making process.
Dialectical Thinking/Reasoning
Dialectical thinking/reasoning refers to critical thinking, deliberately conducted in order to test the strengths and weaknesses of opposing viewpoints. Dialectical in intention, court trials and debates pit idea against idea, reasoning against counter-reasoning in order to discover the truth of a situation.
It is valuable for students to develop dialectical reasoning skills, so that their thinking moves comfortably between divergent points of view, and so that they are able to make some assessments of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the evidence or reasoning presented in support of opposing positions. Through an exploration of ideas, students discover that some ideas are inconsistent with others. They must learn to assess the conflicting ideas, evaluating each idea to determine its strengths and weaknesses, or how the two views might be reconciled.
Key Skills in Dialectical Thinking
The student will be able to:
Dialectical Evaluation Model
|
Question at Issue or Problem to be Solved: (Identify the issue/problem) |
|
|
Viewpoint A: value claim(Indicate this position or view on the issue/problem.) |
Viewpoint B: value claim(Indicate this position or view on the issue/problem.) |
|
Supporting Evidence: |
Supporting Evidence: |
|
Factual Testing of Supporting Evidence: |
Factual Testing of Supporting Evidence: |
|
Tentative Judgements: |
Tentative Judgements: |
|
Testing the Viewpoint Judgements: |
Testing the Viewpoint Judgements: |
|
Conclusion: |
|
Dialectical Evaluation Model
|
Question at Issue or Problem to be Solved:
|
|
|
Viewpoint A: value claim
|
Viewpoint B: value claim
|
|
Supporting Evidence:
|
Supporting Evidence: |
|
Factual Testing of Supporting Evidence:
|
Factual Testing of Supporting Evidence: |
|
Tentative Judgements:
|
Tentative Judgements: |
|
Testing the Viewpoint Judgements:
|
Testing the Viewpoint Judgements: |
|
Conclusion:
|
|
Checklist for Assessment of Dialectical Thinking
|
Criteria |
Yes |
To Some Degree |
No |
|
The student has clearly expressed a moral and ethical position on which there is an honest division of opinion. |
|||
|
The student has provided reasons as supporting arguments for the position he/she has taken. |
|||
|
The student's supporting arguments clearly justify the position he/she has taken. |
|||
|
The student has expressed a moral and ethical position (counter-argument) that opposes the first position. |
|||
|
The student's counter-argument is valid and relevant to the issue under discussion. |
|||
|
The student has argued the counter-argument convincingly and with passion. |
|||
|
The student presents sound reasons that strongly support the counter-argument. |
|||
|
The student creates a dialectic by: showing clearly that the facts in the supporting arguments are true and relevant, providing support for each position, and drawing logical generalizations and inferences that are supported by evidence. |
|||
|
The student tests the value claims with the following or other intellectual tests: New Case Test, Role Exchange Test, or Universal Consequences Test. |
|||
|
Anecdotal Comments The student is successful with:
The student requires instruction about:
|
|||
The Concept of Moral Testing
The Need to Make Moral Choices
In our daily lives, we must make choices that involve questions of honesty, the treatment of other people and acting responsibly. These are moral choices because they are about right and wrong. Moral choices are choices between what might be good for us personally and what would be good for others. We may want to do one thing, but we have doubts about whether we are doing the right thing. When a situation is morally doubtful, we have to have some basis for deciding what to do. Should an individualistic, personal point of view be taken? Should one always be "nice" and make sure that everyone else is satisfied? When should individuals look out for themselves and when should they be concerned about others?
Moral Reasoning as the Basis for Making Moral Choices
The concept of moral testing provides guidance for making moral choices. It is based on a number of principles or criteria:
The Process of Moral Testing
All of the above principles can be summarized into three tests that can be used to determine whether a morally doubtful choice or action should be taken.
Before applying any of the tests, the moral decision-maker must:
Following this, the moral tests may be applied, in any order.
|
Moral Tests |
||
|
The New Case Test |
The Role Exchange Test |
The Universal Consequences Test |
|
This test holds that:
|
This test holds that:
|
This test holds that:
|
The Process of Evaluation
When you have completed the moral testing, you then have to decide what you have learned. There are some things to consider when evaluating the results of moral testing.
Discussion
Discussion is a speaking-to-learn strategy that assists students in developing their critical thinking and interpersonal skills. It gives them practice in expressing ideas orally in a logical manner and helps them to clarify thinking, hear others’ viewpoints, resolve conflicts, arrive at conclusions and find alternative solutions.
When instructing students to enter into discussions, it is important to clarify the purpose of the discussion and the procedures for the process. Discussion is guided by the central purpose of developing the group’s knowledge or understanding of the concept or topic being discussed. The discussion should be open-ended, and should not require students to come to a single conclusion. However, the group members should be able to provide reasons for their conclusions and support for their viewpoints.
During discussion, students should be expected to:
Teachers can build scaffolding for student discussions by clearly stating the purpose of the discussion, by setting expectations for group interaction, and by providing focus questions to initiate and guide the discussion. As well, teachers should make clear what the outcome of the discussion is to be (e.g., written product, action, oral report), and how the group will be expected to share information and ideas. Setting time limits for group discussions is necessary, so that students get on task immediately and stay on task.
Out-of-the-Classroom Excursions
Learning is enhanced in the context that best gives meaning to the concepts, skills, processes and values being taught. Learning experiences that take place in the community's museums, courtrooms, laboratories, streets and natural environments address the diverse learning styles of the students, enhance motivation and connect classroom learning to the real world.
For learning experiences outside of the classroom to be authentic and meaningful, teachers must plan and organize carefully.
Educational excursions beyond the boundaries of the regular classroom are intended to add meaning, vitality and interest to regular classroom experiences. They might be planned as motivating events to stimulate interest in a certain concept or topic. They may serve as first-hand research about an area already under study, or they may culminate a unit of study. These excursions encourage students to become active learners, and provide a way of relating theoretical study to practical problems and the real world, enriching the learning experience.
Some guidelines for planning and conducting out-of-classroom learning experiences include:
Prior to the Excursion
During the Excursion
Following the Excursion
Graphic Organizers
Creating graphic organizers to illustrate the organization of ideas and information aids comprehension and learning.…the effects of graphic organizers are greatest when students have in-depth instruction and training in their use and when students construct graphic organizers themselves.
Bromley, K., 1995, p. 8
Graphic organizers are visual tools that develop students’ thinking and understanding by revealing patterns, relationships and interdependencies among ideas, concepts and information. Visual tools, such as graphic organizers, help learners to construct meaning because they "represent mental, flexible, often quickly changing, and highly generative patterns" (Hyerle, 1996).
Much of the information students encounter in printed text and other media is presented in a linear fashion. Students must work out relationships and construct holistic concepts for themselves, which is difficult without instructional scaffolds, such as graphic organizers. Students require instruction about how to connect their prior knowledge to new knowledge in ways that are personally meaningful to them, and to construct new understanding based upon the connections they make. Organizing and analyzing ideas, concepts and information using integrated, nonlinear visual representations helps students to identify relevant relationships, discard irrelevant data and develop higher order thinking skills.
Researchers report that teaching students to use visual tools, such as graphic organizers, enhances their:
The process of creating, discussing, sharing, and evaluating a graphic organizer is more important than the organizer itself. Students learn from the active investigation and negotiation, or give and take, that accompanies the use of a graphic organizer.
Bromley, K., 1995, p. 28
Students will require instructional scaffolds to support them as they become independent in the use of graphic organizers. Some guidelines for introducing a visual tool include:
Students should learn to use graphic organizers for a variety of purposes, including:
Organizers for Generating Thought
Graphic organizers for the purposes of generating thought develop as students express their ideas and share their knowledge about a particular concept. The resulting structures show intricate relationships between ideas and information. Webs or mind maps are non-linear structures useful for developing students’ quick generation of ideas, and their ability to make connections and think fluently. These types of organizers evolve during the thinking process and encourage free associations and links among ideas as they develop. Brainstorming techniques such as concept webbing, semantic mapping, clustering and mind mapping are examples of visual tools for generating and connecting ideas and information.
Organizers for Structuring Thought
Graphic organizers for the purpose of structuring thought are designed in response to a specific task, and enhance students’ abilities to organize, analyze and synthesize selected information from print text and other media. These graphic organizers are concrete, but flexible, structures that call for student input of specific information in response to questions or headings, and which guide their understanding of the interrelationship of such things as details to main ideas and causal relationships. These visual tools are often presented to students for the purpose of having them complete a content-specific task (e.g., to help students make sense of their print text materials). As students fill in the required data gleaned from their reading, listening or viewing experiences, they also develop their comprehension skills and conceptual understanding.
Organizers for Transferring Thought
Graphic organizers for the purpose of transferring thinking are designed to teach students to improve their understanding of content skills and concepts, and transfer understanding to other contexts. In some ways this type of visual tool is similar to that used to teach students to organize information and structure thinking; however, in addition to improving their content learning, these organizers are designed to develop basic thinking patterns and directly enhance thinking, reflection and metacognition. Examples of common visual tools for the purpose of developing these cognitive thought processes include: classification diagrams that show hierarchical relationships, flow charts that show sequential connections, fishbone diagrams that show cause-effect relationships and Venn diagrams that show comparisons. While these tools are relatively concrete structures, students use them for constructive thinking and create their own transfer of thinking processes from one context to another.
The three purposes of graphic organizers outlined above are not exclusive of each other. While the focus may be on one purpose, other thinking skills are engaged and developed simultaneously. Also, it is possible to use one graphic representation for more than one purpose.
Extended Learning with Graphic Organizers
Following construction or completion of a graphic organizer, have students write and/or discuss what they have learned about the concept or information and about their thinking processes. For example, students who have completed a flow chart organizer could write a paragraph summarizing, in their own words, the series of events or the steps in a process.
Then, they could orally explain their summary to a partner or small group, referring to their organizer or written summary if necessary.
Interviews
An interview is an effective way to gather information and provide the participants with practice in improving speaking and listening skills. Results of interviews can be prepared for inclusion in research reports or presentations.
Students might interview people from the community or topic experts who have first-hand experience or knowledge regarding topics being researched. It is important that students view the interviews as authentic learning experiences, and see definite and articulated connections with what they are doing or learning in the classroom. For example, a student could arrange an interview with a community Elder where Aboriginal treaty agreements are being researched, or with a local politician if the political system was the topic.
Effective interviews are the result of careful planning. The teacher and students together should draw up a checklist of preparation that must be made for interviewing. The following sections describe some guidelines for conducting successful interviews.
Prior to the Interview
During the Interview
Following the Interview
Jigsaw Groups
The jigsaw is one of the most powerful learning strategies for teaching and studying narrative and expository material. This approach allows the teacher and the students to work through large amounts of material in a relatively short time.
Dueck and Layh, 1991
The jigsaw strategy creates interdependence among the group members because each member has a responsibility to learn designated material and teach it to the other members, and to learn the material that others teach him/her.
Some guidelines for jigsaw learning include:
Content Journals
The content journal, sometimes called a learning log, is a useful writing-to-learn strategy that provides opportunities for students to keep a continuous record of their learning as it happens, as well as a place to record their observations and questions.
A content journal is a place for students to record their personal insights, questions, confusions, disagreements, and frustrations about what is being learned….Journal writing is primarily writing students do for themselves; it helps them sort out what they think about what they are learning.
Moore, et al., 1998, p. 198-199
In addition to being a place where students can explore and reflect upon their own learning, content journals are a source of information for teachers about students’ attitudes, interests, understanding, concept development and skills. This information helps teachers to decide what needs to be taught to whom at any given time. The teacher can then provide instructional scaffolding as necessary.
The use of content journals can be loosely structured or highly structured. When the structure is loose, the teacher may require a certain number of entries each week, but students write independently, choosing their own topics and formats to explain their understanding of and response to what they are learning (e.g., some students may write a diary, others may write a letter to the teacher or a peer, some may use illustrations or graphic organizers).
When the use of content journals is highly structured, the teacher requires students to respond to specific concepts, ideas, information and questions being explored in class, and usually determines the format the response will take. As well, teachers provide time for students to write in their journals daily (e.g., five minutes at the end of class, two minutes to record their current knowledge about a specific concept that is about to be introduced). Teachers usually provide prompts such as a statement, topic or question to stimulate thinking, focus responses and encourage reflection. Prompts may be specific or general. Some general prompts include questions such as:
Provide students with model examples of effective journal entries. Discuss criteria for effective reflective and critical thinking skills, and explain the difference between recalling information and interpreting and responding to the information. Emphasize that students are expected to express their own thinking and ideas.
While reading the journals, some teachers write comments to the students, creating a written dialogue about how well students are learning the course material and how clearly they express what they have learned.
Moore, et al., 1998, p. 199
Assessment of content journals is usually informal, the purpose of the assessment being to inform the teacher about instruction needed by each student. Although teachers do not grade each journal entry, they may give students points for writing regularly, keeping their entries up-to-date and demonstrating reflective, critical and analytical thinking skills.
Problem-solving Process
Problem solving involves finding the best possible solution to a problem using a clearly defined process. Students engage in many lifelong learning skills during the process of problem solving, such as communicating, accessing and selecting information, making decisions, thinking critically initiating change and accepting consequences of change.
Guidelines that support students as they learn the problem-solving process include:
Problem-solving Process
|
Statement of the Problem
|
|
Possible Solutions 1.
2.
3.
|
|
The best solution is # because……
|
|
Action Plan for Solving the Problem
|
Problem-solving Graphic Organizer
Research Process
In Social Science classes, students are often required to do research and create reports using their research. Just as often, students are not provided the necessary instruction and practice that will allow them to accomplish their task successfully. It is crucial that teachers and students view research as a process, and that they take time to follow the process in order to develop their research skills and write clear, effective reports.
The following example is a step-by-step guide (adapted from Write More Learn More: Writing Across the Curriculum, Phi Delta Kappa, 1988) with which to develop students’ abilities to locate, gather, select, and organize ideas and information.
Researching and creating interesting, well-structured reports require instruction and practice. Using this step-by-step guide takes time; however, it is time worth spending because the instructional scaffolds eventually become internalized. Each time students go through the research process, they adapt it to fit their own learning needs and styles, thereby becoming more adept at the research process.
Research requires that students receive instruction that assists them to:
Timelines suggested for each step of the research process are approximate. Teachers are encouraged to assess their students’ abilities and needs and adjust the times accordingly. It is important that students have adequate time for each step as they go through the process.
|
Step 1 - Topic Selection |
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Time |
|
|
Procedure |
|
| Assessment Suggestions Involve students in the development of the assessment criteria, and/or inform them of the criteria, prior to beginning each step of their research. | |
Preliminary Research Information Form
|
Student Name |
Date |
|
Topic 1 Interesting Information
|
Sources |
|
Topic 2 Interesting Information
|
Sources |
|
Topic 3 Interesting Information
|
Sources |
Topic Selection Assessment Checklist
|
Criteria |
Yes |
No |
|
Process |
||
|
Product |
||
|
Additional Comments
|
|
Step 2 - Narrowing the Topic |
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Time |
|
|
Procedure |
Traditional Outline Format Write on the chalkboard a topic (e.g., the name of a person well known in history, an issue or event). Brainstorm with the class the kind of information available in the library about the topic. Have the class select two or three categories of information. Demonstrate how to write a report outline using the chosen categories as headings. Topic: Japan I. Introduction II. The Island Country A. Location 1. Latitude and Longitude 2. Relative Location B. Climate C. Landforms 1. Mountains i. Volcanoes ii. Earthquakes 2. Plains III. The Japanese Family A. Kinship Patterns 1. Extended Family 2. Nuclear Family B. Family Homes C. Food and Clothing (etc.)
Graphic Organizer Outline Format
|
|
Assessment Suggestions Checklists are useful scaffolds, making students aware of expectation guidelines or goals as they progress through the activity. |
|
|
Step 3 - Locating and Gathering Information |
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Time |
|
|
Procedure |
Excerpt from resource: Canada became a nation in 1867. At that time the Canadian government feared that the United States might take over the Canadian West. How could the Canadian government prevent the Americans from claiming the West? If Canada was going to become a strong nation, the government had to get people to settle the West. A railway would have to be built so that people and their belongings could get to the West. Immigrants would have to be attracted to settle the new land. From 1870 to 1896, the West’s population still did not grow very quickly. In 1885 the district of Alberta had a population of only 15,500. Canada was still a strong part of the British Empire. The Canadian government wanted British people to come to Canada. However, not enough British people wanted to come to Canada. The government had to look elsewhere for immigrants. It began to look in other parts of Europe like central and eastern Europe. The government helped some of these people come to Canada by paying for transportation and granting large tracts of land. The government gave loans and promised certain religious groups they would never have to fight or go to war. The Hutterites and Mennonites are two groups who came because of this promise. (Excerpt from The Search for a New Homeland: Polish and German Speaking Canadians, Palmer and Frideres, 1990, p. 5) Example of brief notes gleaned from the above excerpt using words and phrases: Canada. Government feared US takeover because population sparse; needed to attract immigrants; built railway; gave loans; gave land; no war duty for religious groups; immigration increased from Europe; Hutterites, Mennonites
|
|
Assessment Suggestions Anecdotal notes, taken throughout the research process, are useful as reminders of where students require further instructional scaffolds. |
|
Note-making Guide
|
Topic |
||
|
Category 1
|
Notes |
Sources |
|
Category 2
|
Notes |
Sources |
|
Category 3
|
Notes |
Sources |
Reporting Research Information
The following section provides information on guiding students through the process of writing reports, and creating oral and multimedia reports.
Written Reports
|
Step 1- Writing the Body of the Report |
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Time |
|
|
Procedure |
|
|
Assessment Suggestions For accuracy of observation, select only a few criteria at one time. |
Notes: Canada. Gov’t feared US takeover because population sparse; needed to attract immigrants; built railway; gave loans; gave land; no war duty for religious groups; immigration increased from Europe; Hutterites, Mennonites Paragraph based on notes from above: The Canadian government had a problem because it was afraid that if it did not increase the population of the country the USA would take over. Therefore, the government set out to attract immigrants by building a railway, giving away loans and land, and promising that certain religious groups would never have to go to war. As a result, immigration to Canada increased and there was less likelihood that the USA would take over the country.
|
|
|
|
Step 2- Writing the Introduction |
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Time |
|
|
Procedure
|
The introductory paragraph should capture the reader’s interest, and may include information that:
Sentences to avoid include:
Sample introductory paragraph: Does the world face an environmental crisis? It is difficult to ignore the daily reports of environmental disasters occurring in all parts of the world. We hear about oil spills contaminating the oceans, industrial air pollution, sewer and garbage affecting water quality and many other ways that humans are damaging or destroying our life-sustaining environment. If we believe all that we hear and read about environmental disasters, it would be fair to assume that the answer to the question is "yes!"
|
|
Assessment Suggestions Use anecdotal notes or a pre-designed checklist to see that the introductory paragraph meets the criteria. |
|
|
Step 3- Writing the Conclusion |
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Time |
|
|
Procedure |
|